this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
693 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

81611 readers
4451 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I sure hope they secretly sabotage on their way out to protect society

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 31 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

"AI businesses are putting profits over sanity and safety".

Remove "AI" from that sentence and you'll see that's just more normal business practices that have been going on for decades.

[–] seejur@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The real question is: what profit? It's a sink hole in a hope to maximize reach

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago

This is a ball and cup game designed to create cashflow where there is none. The 'profit' is the assets, dividends and capital gains the shareholder class will syphon out before the bubble bursts.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 47 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jeffep@lemmy.world 23 points 19 hours ago

Now what does that tell us about the sanity and safety?

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 29 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

This is many companies right now.

Mine is run from the top down (all executives) by people who use LLM's for fucking everything.

Everyone fucking hates them at this point. We all think they are fucking trash.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

The MBA class has long been this way.

[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe it's time to grab some fellow employees and make an employee owned business.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I would love for this to happen in so many industries but everything takes so much capital to get started :/

[–] Mondoshawan@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago

What industry is your company in?

[–] vane@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

After $1T poured into global warming, why can't AI replace them ?

[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They are leaving because they are getting much better offers elsewhere.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

or they see that things will collapse soon enough and are bailing like rats leaving a sinking ship

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 141 points 1 day ago (34 children)

And it's not even working. Not one of the AI companies is profitable. So they're putting the hope for profits some time in the future over sanity and safety.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

In a way this is what’s most scary. Because they are desperate. Any safety concerns will be damned and they are all racing to be the first who makes a breakthrough in the direction of AGI.

If we ever get there, this is not the way it should be done. I hope they remember that we need to have a world where they can spend their money.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 5 points 18 hours ago

I don't think they even care about profits anymore.

Billionaires live in the balance sheet, not the P/L statements.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 89 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Steve Burke (of GN) described the absurdity pretty well, within the context of the currently uncertain Nvidia and OpenAI deal:

Nvidia offered OpenAI $100B in investment, money that it didn't have, as long as OpenAI gave that money back to Nvidia to lease GPUs that haven't been made, to then put in data centres that haven't been constructed, which will be powered by electricity that hasn't come online, to then rent to users who haven't subscribed, to provide them features that haven't come to fruition.

[–] teft@piefed.social 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And hope you’ve propped up the economy enough by the end of it that the government has to ~~bail you out~~…sorry i meant provide a “backstop”.

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 27 points 1 day ago

Just vibe code the AI. I'm sure it'll work perfectly.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 62 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If anybody leaves an AI company with a fat paycheck, promises to "be honest about the real problems," and then proceeds to regurgitate things the AI company CEOs say: be suspicious.

Exhibit A is Anthropic millionaire Mrinank Sharma, who only mentioned (future) peril from AI and AI-made bioweapons, two fictional scenarios on the short list that Anthropic officially endorses. It's a list of things that please Anthropic investors.

Real-world stuff like AI psychosis, poisoning people's air, or generating CSAM doesn't get a mention from him. There's no profit in acknowledging those things, so he won't.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Yep there is a deep attachment amongst AI boosters to certain doom and gloom scenarios that stem from their philosophical "think tanks" which use imaginary problems (e.g. "AGI 'misalignment' destroying the world through turning everything into paperclips") to lobby and alter our laws to benefit their real bosses -- anthropic, open ai, and friends.

[–] melfie@lemy.lol 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Maybe Claude Code learned this from its creators: I’ve noticed that when it says “the real issue is…”, that means it has no clue and is about barf out a bunch of slop that I’m going to have to revert.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 76 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

AI businesses are putting profits over sanity and safety.

All businesses are. That's what a business is. A legal entity that seeks to extract as much wealth from people as possible. They put profits before people as a matter of policy.

Limited liability corporations should be outlawed.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not what business is inherently; that's what capitalism is.

[–] fafferlicious@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's not even strictly what capitalism is about. It's some stupid bullshit interpretation that came out of the University of Chicago economics department.

Seriously, go look at Adam Smiths wealth of nations. The only mention of the "invisible hand" is so different from what is taught in economics now

… by directing that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value, he intends only his own gain, and he is in this, as in many other cases, led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention.

It's not that we need no regulation. It's just trying to say that if we set things up correctly, we don't need to worry about people pursuing SOLELY their own personal gain. Because the market seeks out the "greatest value", which is not just about money. It's also the value to society as a whole.

Instead, we got the fucking bullshit from Chicago saying that the only / best way of measuring value is by profit.

[–] Poxlox@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Spot on. I wrote an essay on this exact topic

[–] Reliant1087@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

It's kind of funny how Adam Smith saw the need for moral philosophy to constrain greed in the economics of capitalism yet for most modern capitalists, capitalism is their moral philosophy 🤣

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s just every company isn’t it?

[–] 123@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago

Not in my experience. Once their clients budgets get cut by funding cuts due to reality and they notice it doesn't do anything of benefit (on the clients side), they will be all "client first".

load more comments
view more: next ›