NotMyOldRedditName

joined 2 years ago

Even trying to recovery half a private key seems like it would be quit a challenge?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I would be shocked if it was still readable. He probably had a shot very early on, but now? Seems hopeless.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I'm with you on this, I strongly recall there was some sort of not fully open source portion of Signal at least at one point in time.

Edit: ya, they weren't updating server for awhile, so while there is an open source server, they definitely weren't running that code for awhile, and may not be running it today. Granted since the decryption happens client side, it shouldn't matter what the server does to some extent.

https://www.androidpolice.com/2021/04/06/it-looks-like-signal-isnt-as-open-source-as-you-thought-it-was-anymore/

Power the house with it when not using the PC, but expect brown outs when gaming.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 42 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Tomorrow

Trump: By executive order, I dismantle the computer warfare and defence division

Musk: It doesn't exist anymore!

The day after

Anonymous: They turned off their service that sanitized all inputs. We just stole everything from every department, and put cats on every governments webpage.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

For what it was spec'd at originally, I think more people would have been willing to consider it than would like to admit, assuming the other trucks were still priced as is.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

He must think it's like the old dealership laws. Once you enter into an agreement, you can't exit.

Advertise once, advertise forever!

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That's from 2022. They made no such guidance for 2025 as I stated. I stand by statement that I believe people are misinterpreting what was written and it was not about 2025, simply where the new vehicles will get them at some undefined point in the future.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Just on mobile now so can't read it all, but it did get the gist across, thanks! I hadnt seen that yet.

I still think they'd have to win a lawsuit against California saying California can't have the program?

Edit: as in I don't think they can just scrap it like he's scrapping other things via executive order.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

When you know you're going to get a billion dollars in credits for something, you plan your business around having those billion credits.

You sell cars cheaper, you expand faster, you try new ideas you might not have tried etc.

Tesla hasn't needed those credits for a very long time now, but if they are there, of course they're going to take as full advantage of the situation as they can.

If the credits had stopped around when Tesla didn't need them anymore, I'm sure they would look very different than today, but they'd still be around and profitable.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Source on the killing of credits?

Those are California ZEV credits, and other similar non USA programs.

They're going to kill a lot of other things, but haven't heard about that yet.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

aims to grow automotive sales by more than 60% in 2025.

I think this is being reported incorrectly in a lot of places.

They said the new vehicles they're launching in H1 2025 will allow them to grow 60% to the 3 million capacity they have.

They did not say in 2025, but it looked like it could be interpreted as 2025 without saying it.

view more: next ›