Nytixus

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

The mother looks like a Karen and her kids behave like little karens.

I'll throw the first stone, yes, I've shamefully spent money on games. Mostly mobile games, where it's far worse than Roblox and World of Tanks combined. I play 8-Ball from Miniclip and they shove ad after ad after ad at you to buy chips, buy chests, buy cues .etc

They have mini-games like Lucky Shot, where you have to hit the ball into one of the targets. Doesn't matter how soft you hit it, it's a bitch to get the ball into the target zone. They have a spinning wheel for chips, it ALWAYS lands on the lower valued number. Always. Like, all of these obviously rigged tricks and scams into the game. And you finally play a game or two and you'll run into players with the best shit who'll win games over you in seconds. Because they've got the better shit. It's just hard to compete with the whales.

These mobile games like to make you feel special at first. But if you play it long enough, you will hit a wall. And when you hit that wall, it's like dealing with a constant panhandler, only in the form of this game, where they want you to pay and pay.

[–] Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They've also restored the ability to play audio files, like archived old podcasts and stuff. Which is nice.

Still, fuck the people that randomly decided to harm Internet Archive. It was really on the threat of being a digitalized Burning of Alexandria moment.

[–] Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org 43 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Getting rid of the advocacy part. That's...not good.

So what does that mean in layman's terms? They're not going to have as much of a voice to sway heads about things like open internet, the flaws of copyright, the problems with privacy and surveillance.

[–] Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org 30 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

I believe that some technological ideas can work. The problem is that ideas that are under people like Musk, are doomed to always fail and will be seen as negative.

Elon Musk sucks.

[–] Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think we need to take our fear away from Terminator and apply it moreso to something like HAL. HAL is more realistic now than a cybernetic Terminator is.

[–] Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org 109 points 2 weeks ago (27 children)

But did anyone ever say that you HAD to subscribe to everything? No.

I must be one of the few people in a group who have a better control in what they feel they can subscribe to.

Adobe expects me to pay monthly for Photoshop? No, fuck you, I've got GIMP and a number of other paint and photo manipulation programs.

Microsoft expects me to pay for Office 365? No, fuck you, I've got LibreOffice and your older Office software still works as good. Your word processing program, Word, hasn't really changed that much since 2007 or even 2003. Hell, maybe not since 1997!

I understand this video highlights some of the more draconian practices of subscription services and they deserve to be. But also, people really really need to learn about alternatives instead of feeling like they've got to subscribe to something that they never had to in the first place.

Also, no, you do not need smart-everything. Leave all of the smart-appliance shit for the richies who happily throw money down on that and let them waste their time and money on the susbcriptions involving them. You don't need them, have some self-respect and know that the dumb versions of those smart things still are just as good and effective.

[–] Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org 42 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Meanwhile at Epic...

"Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh"

[–] Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I roll my eyes at the dishonest bad faith takes people have in the comments about how people do the same thing behind the wheel. Like that's going to make autopiloting self-driving cars an exception. Least a person can react, can slow down or do anything that an unthinking, going-by-the-pixels computer can't do at a whim.

[–] Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Make it your exercise routine. No chumps download shit by the megabytes, you're going to go gigabytes and beyond! HUSTLE!

[–] Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org 24 points 3 weeks ago

It's always a funny situation when one big tech corp accuses another big tech corp of a practice they all know too well in how it functions.

These corps always love dumping dirt on eachother at any opportunity, while practicing the very exact thing that they've accused said other tech corp of doing.

Microsoft, you silly hypocrites.

[–] Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because they're consoomers. Consoomers don't like people who supposedly threaten their product that they shall consoom later.

And consoomers don't want to make the hand that feeds them angry so they'll buy into any and every lie that's been pitched for years about piracy.

 

The US Copyright Office has denied a request to allow remote access to out-of-print video games, a decision that impacts video game preservation efforts. The request, supported by the Video Game History Foundation and the Software Preservation Network, aimed to let libraries and archives digitally share these games with researchers. However, the Copyright Office ruled against it, citing potential market harm and copyright concerns.Key PointsDenial of Exemption: The request sought an exemption under the DMCA to enable remote access to preserved games. The Copyright Office found that proponents did not sufficiently demonstrate that such uses would be noninfringing or fair.Opposition

view more: next ›