Redredme

joined 1 year ago
[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Hans... Are we... Are we the baddies?

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (8 children)

So... If i read this correctly.... The net difference is zero? Except when I'm being an asshole and I dont tip.

So in the end, this boils down to offering the option of being an asshole to your customers.

As an european I always find this discussion weird. And when visiting stateside I never really can "gauge" what I should tip. Am i in a joint which underpays the server? Is (s)he fine? Is 10% enough? More? Should i just make it whole? I just never know. I sometimes even have resorted to just bluntly ask the server or a patron what is customary. (my weird accent helps getting an honest answer)

It's quite honestly a shit fest. There is an amount on the billl... But that isnt the real amount, except when you're an asshole. And if you over tip you're still an asshole, just a stupid one, and if you're undertip you're also an asshole.

Come to think about it: it really boils down to which kind of asshole do you want to be.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago (6 children)

What stuff?

Please show us something, anything.

Was he weird? Fuck yes. Was he a pedo: acquitted on all accounts. So hell no.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I disabled ipv6 long ago and never moved. Not even blinked.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago (4 children)

No no no, you just don't understand it.

God moves in mysterious ways.

Just ask job.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

What you're doing here is the exact same as them: no discussion possible. The only valid viewpoint is yours. The end. And you also add a verdict to your sentence.

I agree with them. You dont kill (cull) a child because of money. You never kill a child.

I also agree with you that a fetus is not a child. And that abortion is not evil or bad.

See? Both can be true.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (16 children)

There is no but. Cheating is bad. Period. If you don't like school/uni go work at a Wendy's. In the restaurant or behind the dumpster. I don't care.

They're all fucking wankers and got what they aimed for. Nothing. Turning this around on the prof is the entire fucking problem here. (it's not my fault, you made it possible so I had no other choice but to cheat. It's a bullshit argument. Take some responsibility for your own choices.)

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Name one company which does. There aren't. Every corporation is big, cumbersome and full of people who make mistakes and don't follow procedures.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

For reasons unknown this reaction was placed wrongly. My client fucked up.

It is in response to https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/u/SnotFlickerman

@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone

What are you saying? Age discrimination is ok? Older people are too expensive? This is a made up problem?

Or are you saying this is ok because it has been happening for decades and it shouldn't change because it has been going on forever ?

I don't get it.

Discrimination is bad, m'kay? Against white, yellow, black, red, old, young, man, women, trans and everything in between I forgot. It all shouldn't matter. Especially in the corporate world.

It's bullshit. If someone does a good job there is no reason to fire them. If it's true then i say to this guy : good for you. Make 'em pay.

[–] Redredme@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a weird take. Just because someone is (or has been) successful he can't speak about or for socialism?

You can't be successful and a socialist? Is that it? That's a very narrow and simply wrong view which has resulted in a lot of damage in societies which adopted it.

Socialism needs succes stories. Otherwise, what's the point? Mediocrity for all? That will never fly or become popular.

view more: next ›