can’t properly explain the differences between an OS, a browser and a search engine
Which, of course, was the goal of manufacturers all along. First computer you used a lot was a Chromebook? Google is all of those things. Was it a Windows 8 or later system? They damn near are the same thanks to web search integration with the start menu that only nerds like me care about disabling.
Not concerned about porch pirates at all
Not everyone has been blessed with the same gift of blissful ignorance that you have.
I agree that people shouldn't order Ring, it's a shitty product for the reasons laid out in this thread and article. But "just be nicer to everyone around you" is not a viable alternative, and suggesting it is dismissive of the realities other people are living.
If you're still talking about getting shit stolen off your porch, anyone within driving distance could be responsible for it.
Do you really think it's possible to try to become friends with or "help out" every asshole within a 10 minute drive of where you live? Or even identify everyone in that range who might have sticky fingers?
The weapons are outfitted with a smaller barrel to accomodate.
The different barrel requirement doesn't apply to all systems. AR-15/M16/M4 rifles in 5.56 can use a drop in bolt carrier group with Simunition mags and ammo, with no other changes.
I almost had a moment that satisfying.
But that particular training op was only supplied with blanks and blue body grenades. No one knows they've been "hit" unless you yell at them, which means you have to give away your awesome hiding spot. Also, they sometimes just can't hear you, so you might have to let a whole disorganized squad bumblefuck their way by without any reprocussions for their utter lack of situational awareness.
But it was still better than the time everyone else had sim rounds in their M16s but I was issued an M9 and a SMAW which they didn't provision any kind of simulated ammo for. I had to yell "BANG BANG" and hope my target played by the rules (they didn't).
its up to a parent to deal with it
What a nice cherry on top of the hypocrisy pie. The party of "personal responsibility" and "small government" is perfectly happy when government is used to regulate sexuality and help out the irresponsible parents that don't want to spend time monitoring their children's Internet usage. Now young teens are going to learn how to use VPNs or just find the shadier sites that don't give a shit about U.S. state laws.
Both of which would be adequately addressed by parents learning how to use the tools that are probably already built into their router.
I don't think that's quite accurate.
The "understand it well enough to explain it to a professor" clause is carrying a lot of weight here - if that part is fulfilled, then yeah, you're actually learning something.
Unless of course, all of the professors are awful at their jobs too. Most of mine were pretty good at asking very pointed questions to figure out what you actually know, and could easily unmask a bullshit artist with a short conversation.
...attracting criticism from lawmakers, who warn it could...
Oh my, if only there were someone with the resources and authority to do something about it.
Are we talking t-bone or ribeye?
I'm more concerned with the transformations from customers to product.
"Hey, buy our expensive shit but also give us all your data so we can also sell it to other companies."
A lot of unpopular "features" and behaviors used to have DISM, policy, or registry workarounds. And MS seems to love to kill those workarounds during later updates.
If MS isn't letting people uninstall it, there's a reason for it, and I'd be willing to bet that users will one day find that it has been magically re-enabled by an update.
I think people who haven't been been the target of insults since high school (or maybe ever?) forget how petty and uncreative it often is.
The point insulting someone isn't to be truthful, it's to be hurtful or put them down.