Saledovil

joined 2 years ago
[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (6 children)

What if we're not smart enough to build something like that?

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago

Language simply changes over time.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Problem with Starlink is that the satellites need to be replaced every 5 years or so.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, but my point was that our current economic system can't deal with, not that we can't deal with it in general. Migrating away from the current system would require the powerful to give up their power, which they won't do willingly, even as the walls are closing in. (In fact, when it comes to global warming, the walls are closing in).

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

So, why are declining birth rates not a problem?

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

It's not shrinking yet, the birth rate is declining, and the world population is projected to start declining 2050.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (24 children)

Maybe. Could also be that humans never invent anything that comes close to a biological brain. Either because we simply aren't smart enough, or because civilization regresses before we get there. And there's several trends going on currently which could cause civilization to regress. For example, climate change and declining birth rates (While we could set up an economic system that can deal with a shrinking and aging population, our current one cannot).

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

So, you admit that it was funny?

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

I'd ask you to read the Wikipedia disambiguation page on scaling (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaling), but you're likely too scared to consider anything that doesn't conform to your simplistic worldview.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I said "scaling" not "scale". "Scaling" refers to how output and expenses of the enterprise behaves as it becomes bigger or smaller. Threeduck seems to think it means "big". And then immediately refers the holocaust for some reason.

Though, the term is broad, hence why I asked them about how they interpret the term.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Do you know what I mean by "scaling"? Because going by your reply, you don't.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Then again, gorillas don't have a concept of money or labubu dolls. Basically, our society gives more opportunities to fuck up.

 

Hello, as stated in the title, I used to be able to generate a batch of 4 images, but when I try to do this now, I get the following error: CUDA out of memory. Tried to allocate 4.50 GiB. GPU 0 has a total capacity of 7.78 GiB of which 780.00 MiB is free. Including non-PyTorch memory, this process has 6.57 GiB memory in use. Of the allocated memory 6.37 GiB is allocated by PyTorch, and 56.09 MiB is reserved by PyTorch but unallocated. If reserved but unallocated memory is large try setting PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True to avoid fragmentation. See documentation for Memory Management

This started happening right after I updated SD.Next to the most recent version. I don't know which version I was using beforehand, since I don't update it frequently. I assume it installed it sometime around April this year.

I'm using a NVIDIA Geforce RTX 2070.

Does anybody have any idea what I could try?

view more: next ›