Sauerkraut

joined 3 months ago
[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 79 points 4 days ago (10 children)

Yes, but it is also a bit scary / dystopian that a $62 billion company would go to such great lengths to have one of their own customers thrown in jail for using the product that he paid for in a way that wasn't hurting anyone.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I sincerely hope that goes well for you. I doubt Trump will let it happen, he has vowed to deport all the foreigners, but I hope things work out for you

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago

Sort of like how it is illegal for companies to fire or mistreat workers for trying to unionize?

The uncomfortable truth is that our laws protect the rich (including their companies), but rarely bind them and bind workers, but rarely protect us.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

The mentality that the future is always someone else's problem is proving to be the biggest weakness of capitalism and our species.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I disagree. Sure, companies have a moral right to recoup their R&D costs on a console, but I fully reject the Divine Right of Shareholders. As long as the emulators aren't sold for profit and no one is hurt, a multibillion dollar company like Nintendo has zero moral ground to tell us that we cannot emulate consoles that we have bought to play games that we also bought.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

I grew up with ads in cable tv, but I never got used to them and I deep resent the emotional manipulation that ads attempt so I will turn a show / movie off if I can't skip the ads. No show is worth being mind flayed by ads.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If I pay for X and don't receive what I paid for, is that not theft? If the police are going to get involved then it should go both ways as a company stealing from customers is every bit as wrong as customers stealing from a company

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

Oh, I like that. The strikethough is a nice touch

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Instead of saying "good shape" which is a boring / potentially problematic answer, instead say "someone who is into (whatever sport or activity you enjoy)". If you love to cycle or trail run then wanting someone who shares your interests is legitimate.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But when people ask for your preferences they want to know your actual preferences (the positives), not the dealbreakers.

For example, if I asked someone out to lunch and asked what kind of food do they prefer (their preference) then I don't want to hear a list off all the foods they dislike.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am pretty sure working from home has proven to be more productive, so I think other factors are at play here. I worry that returning to the office might be the only way to keep the capitalists from trying to send our jobs over to poorer nations. If the tapeworms think the job needs to be done face to face then it is much hardet to send those jobs to India or S. America.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I want to see what the long term economic cost was after they fired tens of thousands of tech workers hoping to replace us with AI. It feels like workers are always the ones who suffer the most under capitalism.

view more: next ›