this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
193 points (99.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54655 readers
594 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 78 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Yes, but it is also a bit scary / dystopian that a $62 billion company would go to such great lengths to have one of their own customers thrown in jail for using the product that he paid for in a way that wasn't hurting anyone.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 15 hours ago

You might want to look into what this dude was actually doing because he was really stupid. On like over a dozen occasions, he live streamed leaked games, days to weeks before their release.

He also sent Nintendo messages taunting them.

Dude deserves it.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 60 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He didn't just use the product he paid for in a way that doesn't hurt anybody, he sold pirated Nintendo Switch games. This is literally at the start of the article.

It then becomes very easy to say he took revenue from Nintendo (the "they wouldn't have bought it if it cost money" argument doesn't apply), but above all selling pirated material is a shitty thing to do.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yep. He sold ROMs. I have no sympathy for privateers in "the scene."

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Definitely. It's not even about defending Nintendo.

I hate people who try to profit off of privacy when piracy is available for free.

It reminds me of my university days when people would be selling PDFs of course textbooks...just email a copy of the file!

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 3 days ago

Your typo confused the hell out of me.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't think he quite did that, actually. From memory he ran a few "shops", but these didn't really sell anything and were just download portals to install pirated games directly from the internet (rather than downloading to a PC first and then copying to an SD card or installing over USB). However, I think he did take donations for early access to new titles, which would have been hard to get elsewhere at first.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

However, I think he did take donations for early access to new titles,

When video game companies accept money for early access to their games, that's a sale. You give them money, they give you access. I'm not sure why that wouldn't also apply here.

From your description, unless you were allowed to donate $0 for access, that sounds a lot like a sale to me.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Welcome to the mundane, realistic cyberpunk dystopia, hope you paid attention to more than the flashy surface level marketing.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Don’t do shit for money. It has always been that way.

[–] Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

Hardly dystopian. They just had someone who understands how tech works on staff.