Shdwdrgn

joined 2 years ago
[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 6 points 2 years ago

Appreciate the link! Glad to see that both my mastodon and lemmy instances have already blocked their content.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Thanks! Guess I should look through the available filters list more often.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I've been running uBlock Origin forever, didn't even know reddit had ads until people started complaining, but it's never done anything for these stupid cookie warnings.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 33 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Ever since sites started doing this, StackExchange has been the one constant thorn in my side. "We'll only ask you once" and yet that popup has appeared every single time I have visited the site, and I'm there quite frequently for programming questions. Other sites like StackOverflow were able to store a cookie containing my selected preferences, but SE seems to ignore my selection and I finally gave up even trying to click on the banner years ago.

Funny thing is, I checked them again after reading this article, and suddenly there is no cookie banner on the page. Hopefully they finally got it fixed and this isn't just some temporary fluke.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 10 points 2 years ago

as long as someone else has an even more horrible life

My parents always knew I would be a disappointment, they just didn't count on that being a positive thing! ;-)

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 62 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Where I work at they decided the "office" people need to keep a presence just in case some random person walks in off the street and wants to ask questions. I'm the IT guy, I have no intention of talking to anyone I don't support, I have no knowledge to answer any questions about our business that I could offer, and my office isn't even near the front desk where I could hear anyone come in anyway ... but yeah it totally makes sense that I should have to drive in a couple days a week to a place where they make me pay for parking, just to sit at my desk all day and answer emails.

Of course there's two reasons why I haven't made a stink about their idiocy. First is that in doing my job, it really is helpful to others if they know they can meet me in person at certain times to fix issues that can't easily be solved over email. The second is that I can see my retirement on the horizon (about ten years away), and in the last ten years the place I work has made a huge contribution to my 401A, so much that it has already passed everything I've put away from previous jobs. If I can hunker down for another decade, I won't even need social security to retire comfortably, and that's a really good thing since Trump and other Republicans have already stated they are trying to eliminate it so they can justify collecting fewer taxes from the rich. I may be one of the last generations that can afford to retire and I'm not taking that lightly.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 10 points 2 years ago (5 children)

It's funny that most people forget OTA TV still exists and that you don't need to pay to see a lot of shows. For the cost of one month's service fees you can get a decent amplified antenna, but if you're near any large cities that broadcast you can get a cheap cardboard-sandwiched antenna for less than $10 and requires no installation. It's cool to see some people are taking advantage of the open spectrum and newer technologies.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 5 points 2 years ago

FYI this same article was already posted in this group yesterday and there's been quite a bit of discussion on the subject.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

The terms of linux don't come into play unless I try to re-use some other licensed code to make a profit, and that would still fall under copyright law rather than any kind of terms&services clause. Installing a piece of software doesn't constitute an agreement unless there are clear terms given at the beginning of the installation (and even then it has been pretty questionable in court cases). There was nothing presented to me to agree to during the installation and I've never once been asked to agree to anything during the installation of any software on my computer. There's no need for something like this in most linux software other than the standard disclaimer that it comes with no warranty. Still not anything I had to click to agree to, it just happens to be on the websites for the distributions.

Even if you want to try and pretend that I somehow agreed so some nonsense conditions by installing linux, it still doesn't meet your conditions of putting myself at a disadvantage to the manufacturer. Surely you're not trying to suggest that my "disadvantage" is that I can't take a group to court for my own failure to use software which was freely given and distributed, and of which very little was even written by the distribution maintainers? That would be as absurd as claiming that I had to agree to an EULA before installing my operating system. Hell I don't even agree to collecting data about package management on my system.

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

My computer was built from pieces of other computers, to which I installed linux and never had to agree to anything. Now show me those ten fairies, the unicorn, and the herald of darkness please...

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hmm ok, maybe not related then. I had no issues with going back to standard SMS, and if they won't play by the rules then why should I care as long as I can text my family?

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Any idea how long this has been going on? I have an unlocked bootloader but am running a standard upgrade version on my phone and it was never rooted. Some time in the last few months I started getting warnings that my texts weren't going through and was asked if I wanted to switch to SMS... yeah ok I'd never heard of RCS before so yes please use SMS for all of my messages, and everything worked fine.

view more: ‹ prev next ›