ShepherdPie

Because the people at the coffee stand complained when I tried taking a shit there.

Automakers will read this comment and think that everyone wants voice control instead of touchscreens or buttons.

So the government just needs to acquire this data from one of those third parties if it wants it.

I just started using soulseek and it seems to be a lot better than what I could source through lidarr as I'm not in any music-heavy private trackers like RED and the public ones only maybe have top-40 type artists available.

Now I wish I could integrate the two because I hate having to do everything manually again along with needing to run everything through MusicBrainz Picard so that it's all tagged correctly.

All the small obscure ones I've ever been apart of have worked just fine with the *arrs

Explain in detail; don't just say it like it's obvious and a "no shit" kind of take.

Your entire argument is based on the assumption that your morals are the "correct morals" while everyone else who doesn't align with you is incorrect. That's a textbook definition of this fallacy.

You are disingenuously undermining what veganism is by phrasing it as a trivial dietary choice.

That's exactly what it is. Disagree? Explain in detail; don't just say it like it's obvious and a "no shit" kind of take.

There is no reason why veganism, as a subject, should get an automatic quick dismissal via accusations of a "superiority complex" than any other subject.

Where has that happened here? I challenge you to quote the comment stating as much. Seems like you're strawmanning here.

I said "veganism isn't about me."

you are just repeating the same exact issue of ad hominem and a thought-terminating cliché by calling vegans "self-righteous" and disingenuously strawmanning them as people who just want to circlejerk about the "superiority of their choices"

"Veganism isn't about me, but if you criticize me personally, you're criticizing veganism!"

This is hilariously illogical. It reads like someone whose brain is short circuiting from all the cognitive dissonance.

No because their dog is also morally inferior for eating meat and should also be punished.

Hmm. Claims to not support animal torture yet joins hexbear and tortures all of us mammals on Lemmy any time one of you "writes" a comment. I'm seeing a disconnect in your reasoning here...

I'm sure it is and outlets are just taking the bait because they know it'll generate clicks.

they have the exact same capacity as me to understand why veganism is a moral obligation.

This is a "begging the question" logical fallacy

this is an ad hominem and, as I stated, a thought-terminating cliché.

veganism is a moral obligation

carnism comes with victims

is it just cope?

What thoughtful discussion arises from someone repeatedly telling you that they're morally superior to you for choosing one specific diet over another? You're projecting here.

I have no issues with someone being vegan, but I take issue with self-righteous people such as yourself who can't help but talk about how superior their choices are.

And here's that exact superiority complex on display for all to see.

I still see people parroting these narratives about stuff like weed even after it has been legalized. Some people are too far down the propaganda rabbit hole.