SkaveRat

joined 2 years ago
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

We're basically horror movie tropes

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Abolutely necessarily.

it works like this:

  • @privateuser@mastodon.example.com has a "followers only account".
  • @someuser@pixelfed.example.com is a friend of above account, requested access and was granted. This now causes mastodon.example.com to push all messages of @privateuser to pixelfed.example.com.
  • @anotheruser@pixelfed.example.com requests access, but gets ignored. But the pixelfed instance marks the user as "follows @privateuser"
  • In the interface of @someuser, the messages are shown as expected.
  • In the interface of @anotheruser, they are also shown. Because PF basically does a database "select messages of users that the user follows", without checking if the access was ever granted.

Important to note, that this would not happen, if the messages weren't already pushed to the server due to the "allowed" user

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

that's the problem. you can't really, without opening the image.

But so far, it doesn't really appear to be a problem

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 4 months ago (5 children)

the problem with this potential issue (if it indeed is one) is, that you don't need to reply. just opening the DM is enough

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 4 months ago

fwiw I got the exact image URL in a DM a couple minutes ago. so at least they are not mapping the uuid of the image to a DMd fedi user

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 months ago

That's a great write-up!

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Reminds me that I have to fix mine. Just shows the LG logo and does nothing

Probably not much more I can do besides replace caps

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 months ago

That comment clearly is a joke that references that

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I skimmed over the article to see if whether or not if they’re just gonna send you another DVD or if they’re gonna do it through other means. I couldn’t find anything.

???

It's right in the quote in the article:

Where possible, the defective discs have been replaced with the same title. However, as some of the affected titles are no longer in print or the rights have expired, consumers have been offered an exchange for a title of like-value.

Consumers with affected product can contact the customer support team at whv@wbd.com.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 4 months ago (5 children)

But in all likelihood there’s nothing anyone could have said to him to make him see reason.

"The CEO after you will mess up the design of apple products"

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 months ago

no, it's a decentralised service on the decentralized internet

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 months ago

I believe that was a genetic algorithm

yes. MarI/O by seth bling

view more: ‹ prev next ›