SnotFlickerman

joined 1 year ago
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 85 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Go watch South Park's "Make Love, Not Warcraft."

It was ugly and goofy looking in 2006 as well.

Your mind just remembers it prettier than it actually was.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

EDIT: I'm so happy.

Good old six month old articles getting reposted, yup, yup, yup.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The endless treadmill, I'm just so tired.

I think a lot of people feel this, and its like this on purpose to make people too exhausted to fight for their rights.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm a Linux user and I think the conversation should be:

More than half (over 60% ackshually) of Windows PCs in service are still Windows 10. Windows 11 barely cracks 34%.

People should boycott this and demand that Microsoft offer long-term support for Windows 10 like they did Windows 7 and stop trying to force Windows 11 on consumers through dark patterns like this. We have a year to make a huge about this deal in public spaces. This is the kind of thing the reddit userbase used to excel at getting word out about. Enough public outcry over a year could force the issue.

They made their own bed with the arbitrary TPM 2.0 requirement. They can drop that and they'd probably have more adoption of 11 overnight. These are business choices Microsoft is making, while ignoring the reality on the ground for a lot of people who never upgraded to something with a TPM 2.0 chip. It's a choice to and a dark pattern to push them to upgrade.

I am kind of sick of the Linux users acting superior instead of being helpful to people stuck with Windows due to work environments, too.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

feels like the deal of the century.

For Microsoft, sure. If they capture all Windows 10 machines, they're in for a $21 billion payday. If they get half of them, $10 billion. A quarter, $5 billion. An eighth, $2.5 billion.

Your $30 in aggregate is only a deal for Microsoft. They'll ask for another $30 a year after that and now you've normalized paying for security updates.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 153 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (13 children)

I like all the comments ready to take a fisting in the ass from Microsoft just to keep Windows 10.

If you raised a fucking stink instead of taking this shitty deal, they may be forced to keep supporting it for free anyway like they did with Windows 7.

They've really got you guys cowed into paying for the convenience of getting fucked, don't they?

This is a company with a market cap of $3.04 trillion and you guys are just gonna bend over and take it for $30 bucks? Wew lad. They don't need your fucking thirty dollars, and you fucking know it. It's a god damned shakedown.

Microsoft: Wouldn't it be a shame if your computer was somehow insecure and got hacked?

Sounds like a Mafioso showing up for protection money to me.

EDIT: There's still about 700 million Windows 10 PC's still on the market. If every single existing Windows 10 machine paid for this service, Microsoft would make $21 billion dollars next year off this alone. It's a shakedown, do the fucking math. (700,000,000 x $30 = $21,000,000,000) Even if only half do it, it's still a cool $10.5 billion.

EDIT II: This also normalizes the practice of paying for security updates for consumers. You really want to take us down that path where every security update is paid?

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What are you talking about? George Lucas invented the Hero's Journey! It's his birthright! /s

It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism

-Frederic Jameson

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

It's purposeful. It's to force you to buy a new one.

A mouse with a normal charging cable placement can still be used by being plugged in when the battery goes dead.

This mouse, with the charging port on the bottom, becomes unusable once its battery goes dead.

No, it's because Apple hates it's customers and is happy to bilk them.

That said, they do make some very nice things, but participate in so much anti-consumer nonsense (not that that's any different from any other major corporation).

view more: ‹ prev next ›