Th4tGuyII

joined 7 months ago
[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 68 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, if Iwantmyname are so neglectful as to pull the entire plug on your website over a singlular copyright claim, then I'd move right the fuck along too. They're clearly not a trustworthy registrar.

To make things worse, Itch.io isn't exactly a small company either. If this happened to someone smaller, with less outreach to fight back with than Itch, I can only imagine they'd have no recourse against this neglectful behaviour.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 237 points 1 month ago (24 children)

So Funko issued a non-apology blaming Brandshield.

Brandshield issued a non-apology blaming the registrar (Iwantmyname), and saying their AI tool definitely had nothing to do with it

And Iwantmyname hasn't even put out a statement.

Fucked all around, yet it seems nobody will be facing consequence for this except Itch.io who got their website nuked out of nowhere.

Though if I were Itch, I'd get a new registrar ASAP.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 19 points 1 month ago

Honestly I've never gotten the desire to do one of these things. You give away arguably the most uniquely valuable and private part of yourself to this company (or companies like it) to do god knows what with in exchange for these results that are (IMO) ultimately just unnecessary trivia about yourself.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 36 points 2 months ago

If the person who put the dildos there and handed you the condom is asking you to put that condom on one of the dildos, then the person that owns the dildo already gave you consent to use their dildo, thereby you can't be a raping their dildo. It ain't difficult.

In the context they're obviously saying that the other person initiating sexual activity is consent in of itself, ergo you can't be a rapist for reciprocating that consent.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 39 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The same year, the UK government resisted pressure to regulate loot boxes, saying the video game industry could self-regulate instead.

Oh yeah, how well is that going?

Self-regulation is a lie, you need an objective referee to ensure everyone is playing by the rules. Having a referee that can't punish anyone is as good as not having one at all

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 108 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Can we just stop trying squeeze AI into every god damn thing yet?

It has its uses, but its a tool, not a replacement for actual hardwork and talent - and if you try to make it be, you'll just get hot garbage out.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're right that sequels can absolutely enhance a game's legacy, but they can equally tarnish it ala Borderlands 3.

I'd argue being beloved without a sequel is better than having a bad one.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 109 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Alas, we will now never get those three sequels that McGinn and his team had been all too willing to create. But, tragic as that is, perhaps that lack of sequels played a role in Hit & Run becoming the iconic title it is today.

Honestly I think this hits the nail on the head. The lack of a sequel for such a beloved game kept people coming back to play it, and also ensured it could never overstay its welcome.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 41 points 2 months ago

I hate to side with big tech, but they're not wrong... DNS poisoning is ineffective when pirate sites can just change domains, and users can just change DNS provider or use a VPN. It's a cat and mouse race that'll be ultimately impossible to win

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 48 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Instead of focusing on external threats and concerns, legal streaming platforms themselves could make the most progress by changing their pricing.

Among all self-proclaimed Norwegian pirates, the most common reasons to stop were more affordable legal streaming services (41%) and the availability of a broader range of content per service (35%).

It's almost like people don't like paying more and more for streaming services with less and less shows on them, when the pirates will offer you everything in one much smaller subscription (if not for free).

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Welcome Anon to the confusing gameshow of "Is she flirting or is that just how she is with friends!" /s

I kinda want to know what Anon and his "female coworkers" thinks counts as flirting. Simply being nice to someone and having fun talking to them isn't flirting, as much as some guys might like to think it is. Now if she was a more touchy person, I can see how that'd be mistaken, as being touchy is also a common way of flirting.

Though find it odd that she waited until the very last minute to ask if her boyfriend could come. And also, guessing "I'm no longer interested" is paraphrased, cause nobody on 4Chan is mature enough to not make things incredibly uncomfortable at work after this.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 97 points 2 months ago (14 children)

Man, makes me want to go back and play some Uplink. Shit's fire!

view more: ‹ prev next ›