ThatFembyWho

joined 1 year ago
[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

oh it's fine, you know how when deer get old and their teeth are all worn away or whatever, and they can't eat anymore and they just starve to death... it's just part of life! /s

[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Apparently they call it "Hindu-Arabic" numbers now. Not sure if that makes it more or less frightening

[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 11 months ago

and they are fed by nutrients extracted from dead humans, because there's no room to bury anymore and the air is too polluted for cremations

[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't Arabs and Palestinians just flat out refuse to coexist with a Jewish state from the start? The international community proposed a solution and they refused to accept it.

Certainly if they chose to fight, and lost, then they have to face the consequences which might include losing their land.

That's hardy unprecedented, the very city I live in was largely founded by seizing lands from the British during the American war of independence, because they lost...

I would say while yes it's "wrong" to kick someone off their land, both parties have to at least be reasonable and willing to compromise when you have a complex ethnic and religious issue. Otherwise conflict is inevitable.

None of which is to excuse any war crimes committed by either side. I just think it's more nuanced than "israel bad apartheid state".

view more: ‹ prev next ›