Who cares? It's the audiences fault for assuming that prior performance is an indicator of future performance. Let the founders cash out. Buyers get rich because audiences think quality will be maintained post acquisition. How often does that really happen though?
TheKMAP
You have bad takes, so my recommendation is to not block Mandiant ASM so that they are able to find stuff, if you mess up.
Ghost is cinematic, sure. But I still like the classic dark souls parry sound. It's like a gasp, and then a giant creature kneels before you so you can fuck it up.
What's the deal with "2o" instead of 20
That's the point of agreements though. If you buy a game and don't like the agreement you should be allowed to return it. If they change the agreement you should be allowed to return it. Agreements aren't inherently a bad thing. There just hasn't been enough backlash about bad agreements or the business models they create.
They call it hallucinations like it's a cute brain fart, and "Agentic" means they're using the output of one to be the input of another, which has access to things and can make decisions and actually fuck things up. It's a complete fucking shit show. But humans are expensive so replacing them makes line go up.
Hey look, another person got blackmailed into fascism. Surely a coincidence
Undertale Frog Fractions? Let's fucking go!
My guess is he's trying to rename Testosterone Deficiency Syndrome because he has it.
It's even worse when you consider the entire point of advertising is to deliver a targeted payload at a very specific demographic. So you can target IT folks of a specific company, etc.
People outside the company knew it was haphazard?