TimeSquirrel

joined 1 year ago
[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Did it for shits and giggles once back in 2006. I think everyone serious about learning Linux at a "pro" level should go through the process at least once, even if the system gets wiped afterward in favor of a more usable distro. Teaches you what the standardized core components are and what they do, and gives you a clear understanding of how Linux is structured. That knowledge will carry on over to other distros and will make it much, much easier to troubleshoot issues with your system if you know how the parts of that system work.

For those unaware or who never used it, it has a huge setup guide with copy/pastable commands to guide you through each step. Theres even an automated script from what I remember. They don't just give you a pile of source code and tell you "good luck".

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Ethernet had this figured out almost 30 years ago with auto-negotiation. Last crossover cable I ever used was in 2004 for a customer's old hub they didn't want to replace. Yes, "hub", not "switch".

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 32 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

In that case, you implement the old API or other interfaces so older things will continue working, while having the new one alongside it, and then phase the old one out when nobody is using it anymore. It's not that hard to emulate an older API with a newer subsystem. Just a shitload of function wrappers and things so that the things your program used to call now transparently use the new system while the program is unaware anything changed from its perspective.

That's what happens with the Linux kernel. Linus would go apeshit if one of the devs straight up broke a ton of user programs with a change. He's already demonstrated his commitment to not doing that in one of his mailing list rants. Because unlike GNOME, the kernel is running some pretty critical things all around the world.

GNOME seems to be treating their DE like their own little pet project that they're tinkering with alone in the basement without caring that millions are relying on it every day. Breaking a large portion of programs on a regular basis is what I do in the evenings. Not professionals.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

This entire article is full of absolutely nothing but speculation with no sources and poor experimentation without proper knowledge in the field, software, or equipment. No technical analysis at all. This person kind of has no clue and is taking ignorant shots in the dark to try to confirm preexisting notions. The "experiment" they ran sounds like something my mother would do and then get all bent out of shape and frantically call me about it.

I want the 5 minutes back I wasted reading that.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

That doesn't mean it's sending anything out through the network connection. The wake word is locally processed.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Its already established that the mic always hot, and that data is always being sent to the server.

Tell me, how have you established this? What were your methods?

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (7 children)

If you're monitoring the traffic, and you start speaking, and you suddenly see packets spewing out of a device every time you talk, that's a good indication. There's indirect methods to analyze it without necessarily being able to see the actual data.

Poking around the PCB with an oscilloscope to see electrical signals will probably be useful too.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (10 children)

It most likely is

Instead of guessing, you people need to learn to use Wireshark and find out for yourself.

No, they don't just listen all the time with an open mic and just send all audio to the cloud. Anyone in cybersecurity would definitely notice that and sound the alarm. There's probably tens of thousands of people watching what these companies and their tech do all day long.

They can get all the data they need through other means, like trackers. Most of us aren't consciously aware of the metric shitton of bread crumbs we all leave behind on the net.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Article said they they actually have a service that reproduces news articles without paywalls. People are deliberately choosing to get their news filtered through ChatGPT when everyone should know by now that these things are not to be trusted with any important information.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 24 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

If you're getting your news from an AI model....I don't know what to say about you...other than don't breed, please. (Not you, OP)

view more: ‹ prev next ›