Ulrich

joined 4 months ago
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 11 hours ago

It does but that's beside the point. We're discussing a hypothetical future.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 5 points 12 hours ago

This is just 12 different kinds of incorrect.

Think of how much diak space YouTube is using

Disk space will be the least of your concerns when running a service like YT.

If everyone can't upload videos it we'll never replace YouTube.

  1. Everyone CAN upload videos to their own instance.
  2. It doesn't have to replace YouTube. It can exist alongside it as a competitor.
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

There is already a plug-in that supports that, along with Stripe integration.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

100 subscriber is NBD. Let's talk when you have thousands or even millions of active users. At some point you're going to hit a wall if you were to hypothetically scale up. Costs of service would need to be covered somehow.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

The sustainability argument stems from technological constraints. YouTube as a company has no problem sustaining millions of dollars in server infrastructure to serve media. Most self-hosters wouldn't be able to do that without significant income.

I don't agree with this perspective but also don't know enough about server infrastructure or video streaming to argue against it.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 16 hours ago

Sure would be convenient if the US came up with some way to electronically verify IDs...

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know how many different ways I can say the same thing and help you understand. It's a trivial semantic argument anyway. Have a nice day.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

if people aren't willing to pay more than the cost of production, games wouldn't be made.

Then that unmade game wouldn't be relevant to this discussion.

The cost of production is the floor, and the cost people are willing to pay is the ceiling, and competition finds a line somewhere in the middle

Again, no it doesn't. "What people are willing to pay" includes the competition. If one company undercuts another with a comparable product, consumers won't pay for the more expensive one.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

What I'm saying is that competition is included in "what people are willing to pay". Cost of production is not.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 17 hours ago (7 children)

It's not. It's just related to the competition AKA what people are willing to pay.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 17 hours ago

Interesting that Andy Yen does not have a Wiki page. But Proton says "Previously, Andy was a research scientist at CERN and has a PhD in particle physics from Harvard University." so, I think he's very smart, he's just outside of his lane here.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Then don't give me excuses. Don't be a scumbag. External launchers only exist to serve ads and DRM, they have no benefit to the consumer. I own hundreds of games, imagine if each one of them required a dedicated launcher!?

43
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Ulrich@feddit.org to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
 

Strava is an absolute nightmare to use. My feed is absolutely chock full of ads and dog-walkers. Don't get me wrong, I'm very happy they're taking a 0.2 mile walk around their block and logging their progress, but I don't need to see it. Nike, TrainerRoad, Zwift, Peloton all have giant ads every time their users upload an activity. And I don't understand it because it's not an ad-supported network. Like I would happily pay to have all this shit hidden. It would be extremely simple for Strava to fix this, which would just be to provide me with a simple filter for what type of activities I'd like to see. The fact that they haven't done so, a long time ago, leads me to believe that they simply don't want to, for whatever reason. Plus they've already begun to enshittify by breaking integrations with third parties.

Are there any good options for this?

E: to be clear, I'm asking about the social aspect of Strava.

 

Playtron has made some waves in Linux gaming. They have lots of big names in Linux working on the project. Recently they were featured by Framework today in their presentation. However, I think it's abundantly clear that anyone who cares about FOSS should stay far away from this.

I was intrigued by this as well some months ago. I even ignored when they blatantly lied about Valve/Steam locking down their OS to only play Steam games. So I gave it a try and installed it. On setup they wanted me to agree to a EULA. That was red flag #2. Never seen that before. Then they wanted me to agree to their privacy policy. It is a very typical corporate user-hostile privacy policy. Some highlights

  • Like many website operators, we collect information that your browser sends whenever you visit our Website. This includes Log Data, such as your computer’s IP address, browser type, browser version, the pages of our Website that you visit, the time and date of your visit, the time spent on those pages and other statistics, and whether you reached our page via a social media or email campaign. This information may be collected via several technologies, including cookies, web beacons, clear GIFs, canvas fingerprinting and other means, such as Google Remarketing and Facebook Pixel.
  • If you access our Sites through third parties (e.g., Facebook or Google), or if you share content from our Sites to a third-party social media service, the third-party service will send us certain information about you if the third-party service and your account settings allow such sharing.
  • "Professional, employment, or education information, such as your industry and job level, for news personalization, or copies of your resume or CV and any other information required to verify your qualifications, for recruitment purposes"
  • "Commercial information, such as a record of purchased products or subscriptionsInferences about your consumer preferences or characteristics."

How we use personal information:

  • To market our products and/or services to you
  • With respect to website cookies, to share with third-party marketing partners to provide tailored advertising on our Website and other websites that you may visit

We share your information with our third-party service providers and any subcontractors as required to offer you our products and services. The service providers we use help us to:

They even admit to not respecting "Do Not Track" signals.

view more: next ›