Zak

joined 1 year ago
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

I have seen that lemmy.world apparently has a very poor reputation among other instances.

It's the largest by far, with five times the monthly active population of #2. One of the main things people want out of federated systems is decentralization, and having one huge dominant server goes against that goal.

I should note .world wasn't the biggest when I signed up. I picked it because mastodon.world was a known quantity, which led me to believe the same team would run a stable server.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

Most servers don't micromanage community moderation. That sort of thing could happen almost anywhere.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

When I say "by default", I meant the vanilla Mastodon web client. Of course alternate clients could do just about anything.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't think long posts in Mastodon are a bad thing at all. I self-host and I changed the character limit to 50000.

By default, Mastodon will collapse long posts in feeds. If you don't want to see long posts, you don't have to click to expand them.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 80 points 1 day ago

If you have millions of people on a social network, and you go looking for toxic shit there, you will find it.

Well, on Mastodon, you might not because by default it doesn't have a useful text search feature. If you're on a server running a modified version, or something else with decent text search, you might. My self-hosted server was on a relay that briefly pulled in content from a famously toxic server. At first, I didn't see it because I didn't follow those accounts, but later, I added an improved search feature and tried searching for some terms of abuse. I did find a few absolutely vile posts.

Bluesky has had a working search from early on. Turning off some of the default moderation filters and searching for terms of abuse does, in fact find people using terms of abuse.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I'm puzzles as to why anyone would routinely post threads to Mastodon rather than moving to an instance without a short limit.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's kind of not. It does appear to be at least theoretically possible to self-host any or all of the major components. Unlike ActivityPub projects, however, it doesn't seem like anybody is doing that and offering services to the public.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Yes. I use it to post pictures of birds.

Discovery built into Mastodon and ActivityPub microblogging in general isn't great (and some people claim that's a good thing). One place to look for people to follow is https://fedi.directory/

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's absolutely an issue for hobby level open source projects.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It looks like you have to have a paid Apple developer account to do it.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Probably some actual racists and a whole bunch of people who thought it would be funny to embarrass Microsoft by getting it to say the most offensive thing they could imagine.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's interesting. This post had suggested it isn't yet possible to host an AppView. It seems the reality is more complex.

 

I don't actually want to do this right now, but I do want to know if it's really decentralized yet. Completely looks like it means each of:

  • A client ✅
  • A personal data server ✅
  • A relay ❓
  • Labelers ✅
  • Feed generators ✅

It looks like the relay might be the bottleneck. If I'm understanding the protocol correctly, a relay could consume less than the whole network so it doesn't have to be ridiculously expensive to operate, but I'm not finding examples of people doing it.

15
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Zak@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
 

I've been self-hosting email with Maddy for a bit, but haven't shared any of the addresses widely yet in part because I haven't set up a spam filter. I'm pleased with Maddy; there's much less to learn to get a server up and running with sane default behavior than with the email software of old.

Ideally, I'd like to go beyond just spam filtering and have something with arbitrary categories like newsletters and password resets. I would prefer that it learn categories when I move messages to IMAP folders from a mail client. Maddy can feed messages into arbitrary programs and pick a destination folder based on their output.

Web searches turn up a ton of classification programs, most of which seem to be more interested in playing accuracy golf with well-known corpora than expanding functionality beyond simple spam filtering.

view more: next ›