Not anything literally from the script, but I assume that's where the concept of a voice controlled AI assistant came from - whoever holds the rights to that in relation to the title "Her". So if it's based on a novel or story, clearly the writer of that.
admin
joined 2 years ago
Huh? The argument was about open source LLMs being unethical, but your video is about Altman?
By using the same hostnames that you need for wanted content.
I honestly don't care who they play for, as long as it's not at the cost of of any regular scheduled gig.
Regarding electronic voting, you can either have reliable and secure, or anonymous, but not both. Sounds like Estonia went for option 1.
Flashback to 2001 when someone with zero programming skills created a virus that shut down countless mailservers al over the world:
De Wit created Anna Kournikova in a matter of hours using a simple online Visual Basic Worm Generator program written by an Argentinian programmer called [K]Alamar. "The young man had downloaded a program on Sunday, February 11, from the Internet and later the same day, around 3:00 p.m., set the virus loose in a newsgroup."
Where? I do see people obsessing over Elon in the comments, but they're not his fanboys.
I'm more surprised they hadn't yet, to be honest.
Over here regular banks have been doing that for years 😥
For that matter - I'm okay with filtering out people who think it's too much effort. Quality over quantity.
I'm aware of that, but we seem to get get distracted from the main point. In the case of OpenAI versus "Her" (i.e. Them launching a similar product, and referencing the film), I think it's the owners of the Her IP that should have a right to complain. Not an actress that was in it, and whose voice is similar to it. According to the article, there were 2 well-known actresses whose vice matched even better. Should they take action as well?
All of this is under the assumption that they didn't actual train on her voice - which does seem likely.