avidamoeba

joined 2 years ago
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 months ago

It absolutely is on an individual level in a system where capital decides who writes the laws and who gets justice. The way you push back is by organizing as a class or at least a group.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 months ago

There's one in the article comments. Talks about getting the material "dishonestly" and violating the TOS.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 81 points 3 months ago (5 children)

WTF is Premium Lite?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

For a while at least.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You can do encrypted swap as well. If you use the same passphrase you can install decrypt_keyctl and use it as described here. It will cache the passphrase and send it to every other LUKS volume that needs decrypting so you have to type it only once. This is what I'm currently using and my root is on ZFS on LUKS.

Another option which I haven't used is to have a small volume that only stores your LUKS keys as files, then your LUKS volumes reference those files as keys, then you decrypt only that volume with a passphrase upon boot.

Another option is to use a swap file. I used to run Ubuntu LTS on LUKS on LVM. That is disk > EFI and LVM partitions > LVM volume boot, LVM volume for LUKS > root filesystem inside LUKS > swapfile in that root filesystem. Upon boot, GRUB is able to read the Linux kernel straight from the boot volume on LVM. Boots the kernel. You get a prompt to decrypt the LUKS volume where the root filesystem is. Once decrypted, the kernel can access the swapfile if it needs to resume from it. If I didn't use ZFS, I'd be using this scheme as it's superbly flexible. Growing the volumes and filesystems for larger storage is easy. Adding redundancy via LVMRAID is easy. Changing the swap size is easy. Hibernation works.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Does anyone know if there's additional sandboxing of local ports happening for apps running in Private Space?

E: Checked myself. Can access servers in Private Space from non-Private Space browsers and vice versa. So Facebook installed in Private Space is no bueno. Even if the time to transfer data is limited since Private Space is running for short periods of time, it's likely enough to pass a token while browsing some sites.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (7 children)

My point is that this could work to pierce the programming which makes people unwilling to learn. Two years ago I might have reacted to what you're saying just the same as Fizz does today. What helped chip away at my programming is the sort of explanations that take what I understood already. Also the audience isn't Fizz alone but also the multitude who only read the discussions. I'm only saying this because you're spending a lot of time and effort to talk to people already. Not because I have the right to demand more work. 😄

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (9 children)

I think you may get better results if you talk about what people understand in their own lives. People understand how utterly undemocratic the private sector of the economy is. They also understand how unrepresentative the reps the dominant parties present for election. They understand who pays for their politics. People also understand how democracy works in non-partisan settings like municipalities, school boards and so on. Often people don't realize these things and need help to connect the dots and build a complete picture, but they understand what's going on. Once the picture is in place, they get it. Then from there you could draw parallels between parts of that picture and China to explain in terms people understand. E.g. the political democracy works similar to municipal democracy, no parties, just candidates and elections.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

The lamp is ICE.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Still trying to pass Bluesky as federated I see.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

It's more than a packaging format but yes. It includes all dependencies needed to run the main program in a container but the kernel. It's a complete separate root filesystem. When you run it, as intended, a single process is started which loads all the things it needs from that filesystem. It's isolated from the rest of the system unless you share resources with it, like directories or special devices. Obviously this results in larger packages but there is a clever way to save on that overhead with layering, so in practice while still significantly larger than single program deb files, it's not nearly as bad as it sounds. The thing is that Flatpak and Snap also package dependencies to a different degree.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

No I use Debian. For anything that's somehow not packaged for it, there's Docker.

view more: ‹ prev next ›