avidamoeba

joined 1 year ago
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why switch from 1Password? One less subscription? Suspicion about 1Password enshitification? Something else?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You can factory reset it easily. You can't use it without the previous Google account credentials afterwards. You can't reuse a stolen Pixel which has Google account logged into it.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 months ago

Better yet, sign up for Premium!

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

The Debian community already maintains a Chromium fork. How much does that cost?

The human time needed should grow with the number of patches that need to be applied to the upstream code base, because some will fail now and then. This is what I refer to as "fatness" of the fork. The more patches, the fatter. It should be possible to build, packege and publish a fork with zero patches without human intervention, after the initial automation work. Testing is done by the users as it always has been in Debian and its derivatives. You're referring to a few full-time developers and I simply don't see the need. Maybe I'm missing something obvious. 😅

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

It depends on how fat the fork is. While I haven't worked on Blink, as a developer who works on other people's very large codebases, including one from Google, I disagree. There are free tools for build automation. That'll take care of being up-to-date with upstream in terms of security. Patching things can be done using conflict-minimizing strategies. I used to work at an Android OEM and I've seen it done with great success. Thinking of Blink specifically, there have been lots of forks during its WebKit days. If I remember correctly there are also thin forks of Firefox maintained by some open source developers. This is all to support thay I don't think it's that big of a deal. Especially if most of it is rebranding and restoring some deprecated or deleted functionality. Could be wrong. I think we'll see, because I have a feeling the cost of maintaining a Chromium fork could be cheaper than patching apps to work well on Firefox. Some corpos might even pitch in. Not to mention that it isn't at all obvious for how long Firefox will be developed by Mozilla. If they drop the ball at some point we'll be faced with implementing new features in Firefox vs patching features of Chromium. ⚖️

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why not all? Add SFTP (file transfer over SSH) to the mix if needed.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

When it comes to open source software, market choices aren't nearly as necessary because new ones can be created at will and very low cost by forking. But in the abstract thech companies are definitely not interested in choices. Choices don't maximize profits.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The old default. They've been a part of market economies for a very long time. If anything we might have learned to tame them a bit as of late.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 99 points 5 months ago

10-foot pole ---------------- Kaspersky

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Inflation is a symptom of the lack of some real resource. There are many parts of the economies of many countries where there's unused production capacity which simply "turns more natural resources into more stuff" if more money enters that part of the economy, without producing inflation. It's not "just spend more", it's "spend as much as you can on things that you want done, which aren't limited by real resources."

I found Randall Wray's lectures on the topic to be eye-opening. If what I wrote sounds strange, and it might, I highly recommend watching some of them. There are a few recordings on YouTube.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Most countries have unlimited finances. They only have limited real resources like labor, concrete, copper, glass, etc. The fact that we still don't understand this and behave as if the metadata of the economy accurately describes reality puts artificial brakes on the solutions of many problems, climate being one of them.

view more: ‹ prev next ›