avidamoeba

joined 1 year ago
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 40 points 6 months ago (9 children)
  • Preparations for a kernel panic screen as sort of like a Windows Blue Screen of Death (BSoD).

This is my favorite part.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Me too, I subbed for monthly.

The one thing I can see FUTO can do is provide capital up front for developers to work which could be recouped over time as more users begin to use and pay for the software. That makes sense and in a competent, not neoliberal economy, the government might have a fund doing something like that. What I'm a bit worried about is that this might not be all Eron's up to. But again, we'll take his money when he gives it, so long as the work is open source. And we'll see where we end up in a few years. 😅

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Is this going to be the mule produced by breeding OpenAI with the Bing team?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 25 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (9 children)

Weird feeling about this. $5-$20 flat fee sounds like a lower price than what I'd imagine donations would bring. I imagine most who would donate would give at least $5-20, and then some would subscribe monthly. The dev team is obviously gonna get funding from Eron for now which would likely be higher today than what they get in donations.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Oh I'm aware, am part of the industry. I think the disparately higher compensation relative to the rest of the economy has given us a false idea we're paid fairly (perhaps even unfairly high) for what we produce. Which I have definitely felt myself. In fact I've felt very strange of the disparities within the industry itself. However that's completely the wrong way to look at it. There's no magical upper number that our labor deserves. Everything is determined by what people pay and how much they buy. (I'm not saying that's the only way it should be) So if the revenues and profits are sky high, and we know labor makes most of it happen, then our labor is simply worth that much more. Given that someone will collect the difference, we may as well get a larger share of it. The sooner we recognize that, the sooner we'll get even higher compensation which will be much more beneficial for people in the wider economy than a much smaller proportion of the exec class getting wealthier. But that can't happen without unions. We mistake the temporary labor shortage for stable and strong negotiation leverage.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Oh this looks decent. British non-profit, I like it. Registering.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

We already have the SO data. We could populate such a tool with it and start from there.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

I'm not attending this pity pizza party to myself feel good.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 78 points 6 months ago

Still, asking the question in this clear way that almost evokes the answer by itself is important. It puts it into the heads of people watching. Could be a union instigator. 😅

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 27 points 6 months ago (23 children)

I'll take Hawaiian.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 281 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (17 children)

“Despite the company’s stellar performance and record earnings, many Googlers have not received meaningful compensation increases” a top-rated employee question read. “When will employee compensation fairly reflect the company’s success and is there a conscious decision to keep wages lower due to a cooling employment market?”

With this leadership, when you unionize. It's literally what they're for.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 41 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Time to download the last dump: https://archive.org/details/stackexchange

E: Seeding.

view more: ‹ prev next ›