avidamoeba

joined 2 years ago
[โ€“] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

Now this is the kind of AI application that's actually productive, would improve the lives of many if widely adopted and help with coping with demographic crises around the world.

[โ€“] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

Same. ๐Ÿฅฐ

[โ€“] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

You know what this means. They're gonna be tightening things up as soon as they smell slowing down profit growth. If you live in a copyright haven, make sure your anon VPN, blocklists and all that are setup correctly.

[โ€“] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

This is a good habit to develop for anyone who doesn't only work, eat, shit and sleep.

[โ€“] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah we're definitely playing on hardcore mode. There are some reasons for optimism though. A lot of people who wouldn't think about these things a few years ago are talking about class. I'm talking regular peope I know. These issues were just not on our horizon until recently. They see things very differently than they used to. That's the hopium I'm huffing. ๐Ÿ˜„

[โ€“] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yes. :D

And in capitalism right now there's no obvious way to reverse the trend. That said, if the critical theory of capitalism (and history) holds any water, the victory is very likely to be temporary, followed by mass unrest and significant change. What kind of change is not so clear but we may have a say if we're educated enough and organized, so at least we know who to support when the time comes.

[โ€“] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

This whole thread reads like slop.

[โ€“] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Isn't this the origin of the police?

[โ€“] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

That's the thing, you correctly see the difference in available time after work. That difference stacks over time. Having read this or that makes you understand terminology, patterns, builds confidence and over time that marginal extra time I have had has made it possible for me to grok a manual in 15 minutes but my father who hasn't had that time takes 45 minutes from his shorter available time. Then there's all the modifying details around kids or no kids, how much more hours the lower parts of the working class have to do to pay rent today vs earlier and so on and so forth. Everyone really but it's just much worse for the lower sections.

And then there's the problem of availability of products without extensive research. There's few brands owned by few large corpos that spend a lot pushing them left front and center on their digital platforms. That increases significanty the amount of work anyone has to do to avoid surveillance in this case. And as you understand, increasing the amount of work, increases the amount of time, and there's hard cutoffs which lead to the work not being done, which leads to the marketing campaigns succeeding in getting dad to buy a Ring. These people study, research and know well how to get people who seemingly have choices to choose their product 8 out of 10 times. Especially when transacting via their digital platform.

Which is why we're fighting a losing game if we rely on the individual when they're standing against the corporation which acts as a large collective with collective resources aligned to achieve their goals. This is why individualism is profitable and therefore encouraged. Consumers, employees have to also act as a collective which pools their resources like time, expertise to counteract this. E.g. by having people, supported by the normies, digest, analyse and spit out the results in trivial form (when posaible) that also takes very little time for everyone else to grok, so they make the right decision. Example that come to mind is Consumer Reports.

[โ€“] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Always has been and it falls on the ones that aren't defeated by the pamphlet to help the rest, since the labour of the rest allows the standard of life pamphlet interpreters enjoy. ๐Ÿ˜‚

[โ€“] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children)

But this maybe implies that there's a possibility to change this behaviour. Which is infeasible. For many of the same reasons why we don't have people specialize in more than a couple of areas.If you're not implying that and you're just saying that in vacuum, then yeah sure. That said it's not the only reaaon why things suck more and changing this behaviour is not the only way to not have things suck, For example a government in a more democratic system might serve its citizens more than its corporations and ban these practices.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ