blind3rdeye

To be honest, when I read the title I wondered if fire is what they were referring to. After all, heat is basically just particles bumping around... could be described as vibrating.

Joplin is very nice if, like me, you don't like product lock-in. The notes are structured and organised, but under the hood its basically just markdown. So exporting your notes to something else is no fuss.

It could be that the characters in the movie thought it was about energy, but were mistaken. (But to be honest, having a group of people believe that to be the reason is just as implausible as it actually being the reason - either way it makes no sense and we just have to suspend disbelief.)

I remember in the early days of the internet Alta Vista search worked quite well. It was easy to find what you wanted, and find new things relevant to your interests - and so it became very popular. Unfortunately, Alta Vista only worked well if people made their websites in good faith. It was searching meta-tags and text on the page; and so when greedy people wanted to get more traffic on their website, they found it easy to exploit Alta Vista's search. As more and more people started exploiting the system, the search got worse and worse.

I remember the day I switched to using Google. I was searching for some C programming stuff on Alta Vista with technical words - and the results had more porn sites than programming sites. Like, wtf. Obviously that search doesn't work anymore. It stopped working because arseholes were exploiting it.

And now, pretty much the same thing is happening to Google. Their algorithm worked better for longer than what Alta Vista was doing, but it seems that self-interested people have kind of cracked the system, and now the results are mostly just junk instead of useful stuff. (Note, I stopped using Google several years ago. I've been using Duck Duck Go. But you're right that the problem is more widespread than just Google.)

Alternatively, you could be this guy.

Look, I can see where you're coming from about the over-emphasis on winning; but it just sound like you're talking about an entirely different issue to what Valve is trying to address.

Your suggestion, if I understand it correctly, is to have the game automatically make a judgement about every player's individual skill during the match itself, and apply some buff or penalty if it detects a major discrepancy between players. Is that what you are suggesting?

I suspect that the existence of mechanics like that would lead to a lot of angst, regardless of whether it 'works'. People already have a tendency to blame their team and blame match-making for making them lose. Imagine if they could also blame the game itself for holding them back. ... It could be a perfect system that never gets it wrong, and it would still cause a lot of people to get upset. And I don't see how it could fix the problem of smurfing anyway unless it is a seriously over-zealous system that erases basically any skill advantage.

Also, I don't think such auto-detection would be reliable. But although we could could discuss the technicalities of what might or might not work... I just don't think it's worth pursuing in dota anyway. Perhaps it would be better suited to some other game.

Are we not discussing the choice to defederate? As in most choices, some options are better than others. Sometimes it isn't obvious what the best option is. People discuss and share ideas to make their decision.

We as a community are faced with the choice of whether or not to support threads[.]net. We can think about it individually, or on an instance-by-instance basis - but we can also discuss it collectively. That's whats happening here.

Heck, I'd say if they are actually playing a game and streaming it, then that's legit... but I can tell you that I've seen a lot of "stretching" and "exercise" streams where it's basically just strategic shots of a girl's arse. As in, that is genuinely the purpose of the stream. There is no actual exercise happening. Some streamers even have "!phub" in their description, suggesting users type that for more info about the streamer... And the ASMR category seems to be a 25-75 split between people actually trying to do ASMR, and people doing a kind of soft-core porn show.

The worst thing is that if you watch one of those streams, for curiosity, or if you were just in the mood for it, Twitch then makes your recommendations look like a porn site for the next couple of months. (I'm not against porn; but I definitely don't want to be getting porn recommendations when I go to twitch.)

Google has teams of highly paid expert engineers who's entire job is to maintain and develop youTube. What do you think is more likely:

1. Google's engineers were unable to tell that performance in Firefox is degraded by their changes.
2. Google sees it as advantageous to disadvantage their competitors - including Firefox. And although they might not be able to do it deliberately, for legal reasons, they can still do it by introducing platform specific changes and strategically neglecting to make it work properly.

Ah, but if you use the rules BODMSA (or PEDMSA) then you can follow the letter order strictly, ignoring the equal precedence left-to-right rule, and you still get the correct answer. Therefore clearly we should start teaching BODMSA in primary schools. Or perhaps BFEDMSA. (Brackets, named Functions, Exponentiation, Division, Multiplication, Subtraction, Addition). I'm sure that would remove all confusion and stop all arguments. ... Or perhaps we need another letter to clarify whether implicit multiplication with a coefficient and no symbol is different to explicit multiplication... BFEIDMSA or BFEDIMSA. Shall we vote on it?

You're unlikely to be in conversation with hundreds of millions of people at a time; or even thousands of people. Conversations happen with just a handful of people. So those platforms with billions of people perhaps allow for some ultra-niche subgroups, but otherwise are just providing a lot of low-value noise with the additional people.