I doubt it will come close to that, it would probably be a very bad copy. I doubt even the most facebook addicted person would put out enough information for the AI to make a good copy of them as a person. Their voice and face, yes, but I imagine talking to them would be just as infuriating as talking to an AI model of today.
They said they closed it as a "cost-cutting measure"... The only costs that increased was that the studio unionized, and unionized studios "cost" more.
Right... They closed it as a "cost-cutting measure" and "not because the studio unionized". This is where the lawmakers are just letting everyone know that they are garbage to be walked all over. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that "cost-cutting" a studio that just unionized is because they unionized, because a union means they have to start paying their workers their fair share, which means "higher costs" to them, when it should've been like that from the start.
There is not. The Dyson Sphere is (now) a sci-fi concept that was never based in reality. This is from the guy who wrote it. It was a joke paper because he thought that SETI was a waste of time, just like that paper he wrote. Look up the paper, it literally won't take more than 15 minutes to read, it's like 1 page long and there is NO math or science in it. TLDR: We'd have to disassemble a planet the size of Jupiter to get enough "raw" matter to build one. It says nothing about how that matter would be converted into usable materials.
Then for a billionaire to pretend to be a physicist just because he's got money, who won't even bother reading the source papers, shows their sheer stupidity to even utter the phrase "maybe we could build a Dyson Sphere in our lifetime".
It's missing another incredible line by Sam Altman, the one where he thinks that ~"we'll have a Dyson Sphere in less than 20 years"... You know.... That joke paper written by Freeman Dyson... That he surely "read", since he's a billionaire, and the paper is only 1 page long.
The nuance is that Tim doesn't give a shit what players want, him and his cronies don't want it because it's harder to convince someone to play AI slop when they know it's AI slop before they even try it 😂
“They think we make the attack on each receiver and as soon as one receiver attacks, they try to swap in another receiver and get a signal from another satellite. But when the missile enters the range of our system, we cover all types of receivers,” they said. “It’s physically impossible to connect with another satellite, but they think that it’s possible. That’s why they started with four receivers and right now it’s 16. I guess in the future we’ll see 24, but it’s pretty useless.”
They're just wasting so much resources and don't even know what they're doing. "Just keep putting more receivers, they can't jam them all... can they?"
"Woah, woah, woah, those previous patents were earned through very hard work from our "lobbyist". If you do that, I want the bribe money back... I mean lobby money!"
Nintendo, prob.
"If you want our money, you are not allowed to stop our services when you find out that we violated your terms of services... I mean IF!"
“So 10,000 years ago, or whenever it was, somebody invented the plough, and we all got richer…. I’m talking about all of civilization, these tools increase our abundance, and that pattern will continue.”
Can't fucking help himself but think of how to get richer. He just came out and said it with his little unrelated example: "this is so we can get richer"... Who's "we"? They want you to think it could one day be you, but we know that's the opposite of what they think.
Must be so fucking hard to imagine a technological advance that doesn't make you richer as priority #1, but helps people instead.
"but you're not allowed to love on OUR platform!"
... Nothing humbles you like that?