They didn't have a problem that needed the AI to help. Unless the problem was "how do I get free advertising?". This other comment has the timestamp and video (https://sh.itjust.works/comment/17839497), and the judge specifically says that the defendant has been in that court many times before, and now that they have an AI business, suddenly they have a problem and need the AI, without informing the court of the "need" for such a tool.
You're right, that's not just technically untrue. The board voted with their wallet, by giving him even more money than ever, so he could continue doing what he is doing. The people on the board wouldn't give a shit if only Nazis buy their cars, as long as there's enough of them to keep buying.
Dang, not bad though
Works in Voyager!
Are they gonna force them to delete the model? ๐ค
Sunglasses wouldn't be what I'd consider "chunky" here. That hat is enormous!!
To that I'd say, "don't attribute to ignorance what can easily be explained by greed"
Dang. Idk, until full recovery, I wouldn't classify a "skull split open" to be "not in danger for their life" ๐
Showing that even a small non-issue use of AI will be detected is a pretty strong incentive for other games to disclose that willingly. Otherwise, why would they admit to it if no one can tell? Morals??? ๐๐๐