burgersc12

joined 9 months ago
[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

Gaming is hard on Linux? Get Wine-GE + Lutris and thats all you need

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Ubuntu worked out of the box for me on my mid 2015 Macbook Pro. Don't remember any specific drawbacks, but it does take a bit of getting used to the differences. Also dual booting is possible, if you want to consider having both systems on the same laptop, good if you need Facetime or something

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nah, some do be playing at 1440/2160p

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 6 points 9 months ago

I liked Debian, but really you can't go wrong with most Linux distros, just find one that suits your needs. Mint was another one that worked well on my MacBook

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 0 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Sweet! I was annoyed at jc141 cause of all the setup you have to do, so i switched to Linuxrulez!, they have simple .sh files to use as an installer.

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I like Newpipe/Tubular as well as Youtube Revanced. Both seems to stutter much less than any of the 5 or so instances i tried through Libretube

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz -2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Placing about one block every 3 minutes is easy to explain?

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Building a heli is easy? Also rolling 30 tons for the fun of it is not something people usually do

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

What? First i am not arguing that we could not do it. Second stonehenge and the great pyramid are completely different levels of complexity. Third, i know machinery can lift heavy things, the point is even with machines its difficult to do this stuff. How'd they get by with zero machines? In the timeframe mentioned above? For what purpose

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

The great pyramid is "assumed" to have had a mummy by people in like 900ad no mummies, just more mysteries. Why is the only mummies we find in the three pyramids from a woman, and a man from 2000 years after they were built? The evidence for the royal tomb hypothesis is surpisingly thin. If you think about what we actually see when we look at the pyramids, they are feats of engineering on the scales of which were not seen again until the 1800s. It is insane to me that we think we have any idea how or why the pyramids came to be based on the very minimal amount of evidence we do have on their construction. Not to mention the mysteries of some of the design choices i.e. menkaure casing stones

view more: ‹ prev next ›