Well apparently that assumption is wrong for certain clients or instances
chicken
Maybe idk. It reminds me of the whole recent defederation drama partly caused by a false assumption that pronoun tags would be visible to everyone. If you don't know what other people are seeing, that's a big source of misunderstandings.
Word filters are fun but if everyone has a different filter that seems like it would get ridiculous real fast
debates on hypothetical scenarios have no bearings on the law or how it’s applied
This isn't true though, tons of hypotheticals showing up in and being relevant to the outcome of court decisions. Not sure the general "compatibility" of an ideology to the constitution is very relevant here either since afaik there isn't anything in there limiting what flags local governments can fly at government buildings, sounds like the deciding factor is whether the town council votes to allow a particular flag. Which would mean that what this guy is saying doesn't make sense either, if ISIS got elected in that town they could vote to put their flag up regardless of the previous policy.
Although under the hood they were still turn based
There's a really big difference, the tactic of having whoever has aggro run away while everyone else shoots projectiles doesn't work at all in an actually turn based system.
“Could a president order SEAL Team Six to assassinate a political rival? That’s an official act–an order to Seal Team Six,” U.S. Circuit Judge Florence Pan asked Sauer.
“He would have to be, and would speedily be, you know, impeached and convicted before the criminal prosecution,” Sauer replied, setting a pre-condition for such prosecution in Pan’s hypothetical.
I wonder if that's true. Would a congress controlled by the Republican party of today really follow through with impeachment for that? I'm sure such a president would have all kinds of excuses as to why they had to do it and how their rival was a threat to national security etc etc that their followers would take at face value.
Is there a community for criticisms of moderation? I'd subscribe to that
Of course, I don’t believe AI girlfriends are going to completely replace relationships. But I do think that, much like online porn, they will be there – always accessible, always a temptation, always a source of instant satisfaction. And I think it’s likely that, for some, a real girlfriend just won’t seem enough on her own, especially considering nearly half of Replika’s users are already in a relationship or married.
Doesn't seem that bad tbh, the dynamic of men being expected to have zero emotional outlets other than their romantic partner has always been super toxic and doesn't make things better for anyone.
The only faint glimmer of optimism I can find in all this is that I think, at some point, life might become so stripped of reality and humanity that the pendulum will swing. Maybe the more automated, predictable interactions are pushed on us, the more actual conversations with awkward silences and bad eye contact will seem sexy. Maybe the more we are saturated with the same perfect, pornified avatars, the more desirable natural faces and bodies will be. Because perfect people and perfect interactions are boring. We want flaws! Friction! Unpredictability! Jokes that fall flat! I hold onto hope that someday we will get so sick of the artificial that our wildest fantasies will be something human again.
This article is pretty reasonable
A year ago local LLM was just not there, but the stuff you can run now with 8gb vram is pretty amazing, if not quite as good yet as GPT 4. Honestly even if it stops right where it is, it's still powerful enough to be a foundation for a more accessible and efficient way to interface with computers.
The feature only lets you filter posts, not users from that instance.
I am curous about the VRAM and price points and whether they will be useful for LLMs
Hope it goes up more