Happy to help!
ggppjj
"This code is giving me a return value of X instead of Y"
"Ah the reason you're having trouble is because you initialized this list with brackets instead of new()
."
"How would a syntax error give me an incorrect return"
"You're right, thanks for correcting me!"
"Ok so like... The problem though."
Not copilot, but I run into a fourth problem:
4. The LLM gets hung up on insisting that a newer feature of the language I'm using is wrong and keeps focusing on "fixing" it, even though it has access to the newest correct specifications where the feature is explicitly defined and explained.
They just brought back print and it's been very satisfying for me so far.
It doesn't get them money, but it still registers as engagement with the audience which I think is really the only true metric.
Does macOS respond to external keyboard power button presses because if so this could very well be as easy money-making real product
I'm in tears, I've finally found the version of this toy I had as a kid.
Thank you so much for this shitpost, sincerely.
I guess I just don't understand the relevance of his other opinions to the discussion about the specific ones we're talking about.
"I was served a plate of raw chicken tenders" "The chef usually makes Michelin quality meals"
It just doesn't advance the actual discussion.
That doesn't make any sense. He's a valuable addition to... What general community, humanity? I mean, I'm not disputing that he has a following, I just don't see how that has anything to do with the discussion around his self-professed and now recanted dogshit awful opinions about the lives of other humans.
What's the purpose of your post? It comes off as agreement with his message at worst, and an irrelevant non sequitor at best.
I do try to keep the "unknown unknowns" problem in mind when I use it, and I've been using it far less as I latched on to how OOP actually works and built up the lexicon and my own preferences. I try to only ask it for high-level stuff that I can then use to search the wider (hopefully more human) internet more traditionally with. I fully appreciate that it's nothing more than a very incredibly fancy auto-completion engine and the basic task of auto-complete just so happens to appear intelligent as it gets better and more complex but continues to lack any form of real logical thoughts.
Well yeah it'd be weird to defend gaben against allegations at a different company.
Oh, did you mean that gaben is the only person who has a weirdly parasocial fan base? That's demonstrably not true.