ironhydroxide

joined 2 years ago
[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This also ignores the fact that the person in the car the second time XM3 5D9 was spotted is not necessarily the same person in the car the first. So one could easily false accuse.

Agreed. And the search engines returning AI generated pages masquerading as websites with real information is precisely why I spun up a searXNG instance. It actually helps a lot.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Many phones have exploits that bypass the pin. Governments have tools specifically designed to use these

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Character*

*Profit for the wealthy.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Trains don't benefit much from lesser weight.

Drones, and planes are the most likely to benefit from this.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Got bad news for you buddy.

Wires ARE antennas.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 45 points 4 months ago

Or scrape my ass across their damned dispenser.

Fuck that noise.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 months ago

But one you can underpay and abuse because they are excited. The other has a lot better idea of what they'll accept and will leave when it's not worth it anymore.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 44 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Perfect, we can now detect at what level to hold the populous so they'll keep working, and not revolt.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago

Remember? That's like half the stations around. The other half don't do "uninterrupted" blocks

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Part of the function of the lock should be to indicate of forced entry.

Sure they could attack a window, but then you know something happened.

A magnet attack on a smart lock usually leaves no indication of bypass. So you still think everything is as you left it, untill you need that one thing and it's gone.

Of course this is more for specific targeted attacks, but still, if you report to insurance that things are missing and they ask if you locked the door, but then there's no indication of forced entry. How likely are they to pay out, or keep you as a client?

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Plot twist, death is their only freedom

 

Had a thought, but some quick searching didn't really give me much.

Is there such a thing as a browser that respects privacy, and can be synched through self hosted means?

I'd be looking for tab sync, bookmark, history, etc.

 

So, I'm trying to setup self hosted rustdesk. I have it running in a docker container. I have allowed the ports through the firewall. I have setup the same ports forwarded in my router, to the server running rustdesk. I have set the private key on both clients.

on systems internal network, I can setup the clients to connect with internal IP. And get the "ready" at the bottom. But key mismatch error when trying to actually connect between two internal systems.

If I setup the client with my external up (and I've tried domain name as well) I get a delay then, "not ready please check your connection", as well as the key mismatch.

I feel I'm running into two different problems, but I can't find any hints looking through the container logs (in fact, once the containers are running, I don't really get any logs populating when trying to connect a client)

Any suggestions? I'm at a loss here.

31
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
 

I've been using RealVNC for family computer help and have been wanting to setup a self hosted replaced for a while now, but haven't had the time. RealVNC has recently axed their free levels, so I'll use it as a reason to setup a self hosted solution.

Ideally it would be something like a web page (I have a domain and reverse proxy) where family can go, get a code or a software to run, which will then let me control their system securely.

I was considering guacamole on a pi at each location I'm likely to have to support, but this doesn't help when family is away from their home network on laptop.

What is out there for this? Have you used it? What are your experiences?

Thanks

view more: next ›