ook_the_librarian

joined 2 years ago
[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Is this seriously your takeaway from a well-thought out post? This the smugness of reddit that I really don't miss.

edit: I am refering to the root comment, as that isn't clear.

It's what percentage of countries have one that would matter.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe I've always just felt a Roblox-shaped hole in my heart.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's easier to boycott than diapers, my friend.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Buying cat litter when you also need diapers and have to shop with a baby in tow? I'll be anti-consumer next year.

 

I thought I would knock some dust off my drafting skills after a small chat with @captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works

Seeing this image on the tutorial made me realize, FreeCAD seems to be a Technical Geometry Super-Suite. It makes sense that CAD would grow to include all of these things. But I thought sharing the initial perspective of some one who hasn't looked at this stuff in about 18 years might be interesting.

Granted I'm not actually familiar with most of this stuff, and none of it from the POV of FreeCAD. If this can deliver 10% of what I'm looking at, I'm in for a treat.

Humans are horrible, but a main-stream social media platform should not be a celebration of it. People need to demand change and then leave if ignored. I seem to hear people demanding change. The next step has more impetus.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You haven't learned to add "probably" when you're sure of something on lemmy?

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Which is probably how chatgpt learned to code in the first place.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wasn't thinking of like a watermark that is like anyone's signature. More of a crypto signature most users couldn't detect. Not a watermark that could be removed with visual effects. Something most people don't know is there, like a printer's signature for anti-counterfeiting.

I don't want to use the word blockchain, but some kind of way that if you want to take a fake video created by someone else, you are going to have a serious math problem on your hands to take away the fingerprints of AI. That way any viral video of unknown origin can easily be determined to be AI without any "look at the hands arguments".

I'm just saying, a solution only for good guys isn't always worthless. I don't actually think what I'm saying is too feasible. (Especially as written.) Sometimes rules for good guys only isn't always about taking away freedom, but to normalize discourse. Although, my argument is not particularly good here, as this is a CA law, not a standard. I would like the issue at least discussed at a joint AI consortium.

[–] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's true, but it would be nice to have codified way of applying a watermark denoting AI. I'm not say the government of CA is the best consortium, but laws are one way to get a standard.

If a compliant watermarker is then baked into the programs designed for good actors, that's a start.

He did call it the highlight of his day.

view more: next ›