rah

Who is yalls go to

O_o

free software communities

TheLinuxExperiment on YouTube

LOL

every instance has some users worth keeping in some conversation

That doesn't contradict what I said.

Refraining from making the fediverse an archipelago where people refuse to talk to anyone who had the misfortune of picking the wrong instance

The fediverse cannot now be made that because the fediverse is already that.

Do they genuinely believe the shit they're peddling or are they paid propagandists or is their something more nefarious afoot.

From my interactions, I've come to the conclusion that they're mostly seriously broken people who've discovered Marx, convinced themselves that capitalism is the cause of all suffering and believe socialism is the solution that will free them from their trauma. The degree of their attachment to socialism is a reflection of the degree of their suffering and brokenness.

If they weren't so toxic, they'd be deserving of compassion and forebearance.

Thanks but I meant links to your posts :-) Or more specifically, the communities you post to with anti-regime info. I looked through your profile but I couldn't see where you were posting such things beyond World News.

if we want Lemmy to be something besides a place for Soviet simps to hide from criticism

There is definitely a place for Soviet simps in the Fediverse, it's just in a corner all by itself. That's the beauty of the Fediverse.

I post about horrors that are happening in Ukraine (not the ones that are committed by Russia, but by Zelensky’s regime with support from the west)

Any chance of a link? Just out of curiosity.

Every time we fragment the fediverse we make it overall worse.

Only if your conception of better/worse is focussed on user count rather than user quality.

Average users don’t even understand what they’re looking at when it comes to decentralized networks

Refraining from defederation won't change that.

You tell us; you haven't improved the basic stuff so you have the answer already in your own behaviour.

Finally!

In this context, the word "dictatorship" means something very different to what it means in general usage referring to the governance of nation states. OP's comment seems like a silly effort to try and shoe-horn their favourite political subject into a thread where the subject doesn't fit.