reverendsteveii

joined 1 year ago
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

if this thing is being sold because it's a propaganda and data mining risk, selling it to a cohort of government insiders doesn't make me feel better.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

source?

First page when you google 'Steve Mnuchin'

the npr interview I heard

source?

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 44 points 7 months ago (31 children)

once again - not a ban, a seizure. Steve Mnuchin is heading a group of government insiders who want to buy TikTok, and this bill bans it if and only if they don't sell. The government has decided that TikTok is a dangerous propaganda and espionage network and intends to steal it and run it themselves. Even if you think that TikTok is that dangerous you have to ask yourself: why is it legal for everyone else and why does our government want so badly to do it themselves?

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I'm a dude, it's just a clever name. It'll do dudes, it's just gonna give you huge tits. What you're into is, of course, your business.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago (5 children)

I guess it's really in whether you use it with consent. I used one on my own picture just to see how it worked. It gave me huge tits but other than that was scarily accurate.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

your conclusion doesn't follow from your premise. the ability to live indoors is going to be important to people even if they think the system by which we decide who is allowed to live indoors is kinda shit.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How do you think it came to be that most Americans believe that in China you can have your home seized for being impolite?

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

I agree with you, but I'm assuming malice because I don't think that stupidity adequately explains their behavior. I think that, to them, the problem isn't propaganda and espionage, it's Chinese propaganda and Chinese espionage where American propaganda and American espionage should be. That's why they're not making what tiktok does illegal, and that's why they're trying to force a sale rather than actually banning it.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

you've failed to answer my second question, which I believe was the important one: why should this behavior be perfectly legal for everyone other than tiktok?

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

they aren't even banning tiktok, at least they're trying not to. What they're trying to do is force a sale specifically to US government insiders. They're seizing it. They want that sweet, sweet propaganda and data mining for themselves.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago (13 children)

what did tiktok do to deserve being banned, and why is it okay for other companies to do that?

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

each member of the class is gonna get the cash value of 2 oz beer * number of short beers they bought * .6 (assuming 40% attorneys fees). Nobody's retiring off this money.

view more: ‹ prev next ›