slappyfuck

joined 7 months ago
[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

The real crime is that this is not a vision for how Palestinians should be living, even though they deserve to.

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are they really able to replicate pornography like that? I know that for normal stuff, the videos are only under ten seconds or so.

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Let’s also remember that AI has many different meanings. It depends on what technology they’re using. AI is just literally a type of computer program that can be used for a variety of things.

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Not banning good people, banning wrong people.

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was hoping you’d play along :’(

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I have been doing IT since 1867 and I’ve never run into an issue.

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Banning ideas and opinions is not banning fascism. But let’s start over. First, they banned me. All I did was say that banning people for having the opinion “Israel should exist as an entity” is authoritarian. I wasn’t even defending Israel, which, like I said, people should be allowed to do as part of normal freedom of speech.

Second, I didn’t even say anything extreme, like “you should be hanged for treason!” or some such nonsense. I said “you have the right to ban people for whatever you want since it’s your instance, but I think that’s fascist if you do so.” And they banned me. Do you think that’s even remotely normal behavior?

Banning people for their behavior and conduct is perfectly reasonable. Also, if some Israel defender comes in and says “I don’t care how many children need to be killed, it’s worth it,” then I think you have every right to ban them. Advocating murder is crazy shit. But simply saying “Israel has a right to exist” or something similar as being ban worthy? That’s absolute ghoulish authoritarianism. There’s no such thing as “banning fascism” because this is just a discussion forum.

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Fascists. Authoritarians. Whatever you want to call them. I’ll explain. They submitted a proposal to ban all “Zionists or Zionist apologists” and I objected on the grounds that it is, objectively, the very fascism they were denouncing. They banned me simply for suggesting this. That’s what I’m talking about.

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago

Since you do not understand even the smallest aspect of what I said, you are not in a position to make such a judgment.

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca -5 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

“Strong left bias” is not bias, it is just a reflection of normal human decency. If you mean that fake leftists like the dbzero fascists are around a lot, I would agree and it’s a problem.

[–] slappyfuck@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Sort of. I am highly skeptical of anyone who jumps to use that term when people are complaining about particularly egregious corporations/practices, but at the same time, if you denounce people for buying Harry Potter shit then I think you’re nuts.

view more: next ›