yeather

joined 1 year ago
[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (6 children)

More like .ml has bad mods and community.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

it’s .ml knocking it down a few points.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Except the canucks

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

They’re banking on people spending more than they have, putting them in debt to banks (which they want) so they can own you more. They want you right on the edge so you are never able to achieve true freedom from under their thumb.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Bush’s fault, got it.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

Quick, clean civil wars are usually called a coup d’état. Quick purges of the leadership, replacement with people loyal to you, and then life continues on. If your coup fails and you have enougj resources to continue the fight then you get to civil war.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Yes, should be

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)
  1. Sometimes, yes, many times a family member may call EMS to hand them the DNR, this ensures proper procedures are followed when dealing with the body, less mess, and a quicker certification of death. It may also be important in situations where the person is influencial or rich and ensures you cannot be accused of foul play.

  2. No, DNRs have certain things that make them official, signatures and notarized markings. Usually one person will begin life saving measures while the ither verifies the DNR. EMS never work alone.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

You have to take “reasonable, actionable steps to rescue another in a hazardous or dangerous situation.” This may mean just calling the police, or in a case like drowning, throwing a life preserver and flaging down a lifeguard.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Not illegal, good samaritan laws protect you either way. However, there is a “duty to rescue” if:

1: You created the hazard that lead the person into danger, you must provide rescue.

2: A special relationship exists. Spouses must rescue each other, parents must rescue children, employers must rescue employees, property owners to invitees but not trespassers.

3: In some jurisdictions you have a duty to notify, which is usually calling the police, but you do not have to take any measures to help them beyond that. Only 10 states require this and is never actually enforced.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, courts have ruled the tattoo could mean anything, and you need to provide the documentation for it to count. The tattoo could lead to them looking for a DNR though.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 months ago

The problem is the wheelchair is not condusive to an adventuring environment, and minor changes do not make them work and any large changes make them no longer wheelchairs.

Disabled people exist, and they exist in fantasy and in history, but when your world has magic and “advanced technology” (artificers), there are so many better options than a simple wheelchair. Having your pc have an optional disability, then choosing the least optimal way to work around the disability, then complain when people begin to attempt to fix or change the disability is entirely on you.

Professor X lives in a time of asphalt and pavement.

Wagons and wheelbarrows don’t go adventuring. They go on predetermined dirt paths or in fields. Areas where a wheelchair CAN go but is not optimal. Any magical fantasy setting would never have wheelchairs because they are simply imprsctical for the period and multiple magical alternatives thst are objectively superior.

view more: ‹ prev next ›