zalgotext

joined 2 years ago
[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Right, I've seen the footage too, and I don't think I'd recognize it as a Borderlands game if the name wasn't included in the ads. I'm struggling to understand why they chose to go that route, rather than sticking to the beloved, iconic, performant art style of the other games in the series.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

You shouldn't need leaps in hardware to render a highly stylized cell shaded video game in the year 2025.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly, like what CDPR did with Cyberpunk - own up to the fact that it was shit on release, then take the time to fix it and update it. People flipped nearly overnight from having a negative opinion of the game to a positive one when they released the working version of the game (plus a really solid DLC, which probably helped too).

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

No, your LLM writes your design documentation and tells you how your application is supposed to work, according to what you wrote.

Also, you're either writing dead-simple applications, or you're being incredibly hyperbolic if those are the only questions left left after your design document is written.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

But I get to focus on the parts where that judgement is actually needed and not the more mundane and toilsome parts of coding.

The parts you're doing yourself are writing tests and fixing vibe-coded bugs. And you're outsourcing all the creative, design-based aspects of programming. I think you and I have very different definitions of "mundane" and "toilsome".

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Nah fuck right off with that shit. For the last year the rest of the world has been telling us to do violent revolution, asking us "when are y'all gonna exercise your precious 2A rights"? Now that someone has killed one of the Nazis, you're gonna say we're the bloodthirsty ones?

Fuck.

You.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Your stupid fucking purity tests don't matter when the Nazis are actively killing people

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Having to figure out hosting, no matter if it's self, peer, or whatever else hosting, kinda makes this proposal DOA I think. It's kinda using a jackhammer for a problem that's already been solved by a screwdriver.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

A did is a virtual actor that reroutes to a real actor and collects content across real actors

Where is that virtual actor hosted? If it's centralized, I feel like it defeats the purpose of user-centric identity control. If it's user-hosted, that sounds like GPG with extra, even more inconvenient steps.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah I don't think this is gonna get anywhere when the easiest alternative to controlling your account is to just host your own Lemmy instance, and you can do that literally right now with no changes to Lemmy or the protocol.

It'd be nice for ActivityPub to support optional GPG signatures for those that want to have that level of control. That would get you all the identity verification that this new fangled did stuff gets you, with the added bonus of GPG being a reliable, existing, proven technology that people already know how to support.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

LLMs can't just run chromium unless they're tool aware and have an agent running alongside them to facilitate tool use. I highly suspect that AI web crawlers aren't that sophisticated.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 weeks ago

Most of that comment is basic American history chief

view more: next ›