I mean if you ignore all the papers that point out how dubious the gen AI benchmarks are, then it is very impressive.
zbyte64
joined 1 year ago
WDYM? The big corporations get a free pass to ignore their climate pledges and do the exact opposite.
I must've missed that announcement at the last antifa meetup.
They side with the laws enacted by the people, not the people. And all federal judges are appointed.
This doesn't seem to be working as intended. We have "originalists" who turn that concept on it's head and are explicitly a political project.
It's a great narrative that happens to justify a power grab by the judicial branch; probably the least democratic of the three branches.
Can't really answer the expense trade-off until you look at concrete use cases, something general AI is allergic to...
Certain types of content. But YouTube's own existence started because people made content without licensing rights.
Yeah, warning labels just make people dumber and less safe somehow.
Detecting an LLM is a skill.
Ever heard of the Turing test? Ever since AIs could pass it it became not a thing.
In place of the Turing test we have a new test that informs us whether an individual can properly identify a stochastic parrot
Humans predict things by assigning meaning to events and things, because in nature, we're constantly trying to guess what other creatures are planning. An LLM does not hypothesize what your plans are when you communicate to it, it's just trying to predict the next set of tokens with the greatest reward value. Even if you were to use literal human neurons to build your LLM, you would still have a stochastic parrot.