this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
1668 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59963 readers
3431 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aztechnology@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Leaving the DNA behind doesn't really identify him if his DNA is not in the system.

But nowadays the odds some relative of yours put theirs up on some family tree site is pretty high so they could narrow the suspect pool quite a bit going that route.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

His DNA doesn't need to be in any system. These days there are professionals that take DNA results and comb through the databases to find close relatives that are in the system. It's how they caught the BTK Killer.

[–] Starrifier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think you're thinking of the Golden State Killer (among many others). BTK was caught through digital forensics, not forensic genealogy.