this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
458 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

59963 readers
4060 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If this is the way to superintelligence, it remains a bizarre one. “This is back to a million monkeys typing for a million years generating the works of Shakespeare,” Emily Bender told me. But OpenAI’s technology effectively crunches those years down to seconds. A company blog boasts that an o1 model scored better than most humans on a recent coding test that allowed participants to submit 50 possible solutions to each problem—but only when o1 was allowed 10,000 submissions instead. No human could come up with that many possibilities in a reasonable length of time, which is exactly the point. To OpenAI, unlimited time and resources are an advantage that its hardware-grounded models have over biology. Not even two weeks after the launch of the o1 preview, the start-up presented plans to build data centers that would each require the power generated by approximately five large nuclear reactors, enough for almost 3 million homes.

https://archive.is/xUJMG

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

*doesn't read the article*

This is true. I've already moved onto Gemini. GPT already feels dated by comparison.

[–] dave@feddit.uk 24 points 1 week ago

doesn’t realise that Gemini is a GPT

Comments anyway.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't trust Gemini to get anything right, it's just A million SEO monkeys.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair, there is currently no AI that is reliable for fact checking.

I like it because it generates faster, more detailed responses. Currently I'm using it extensively for resumes and cover letters, and for making my correspondence with potential employers sound more intelligent by having it rewrite my messages for me. It's really good at that.

It also helped me reposition my 5G mmWave antenna perfectly, literally doubling my home internet speeds. It also seems to be better at writing code, or at least better at understanding what I'm trying to get out of the code.

[–] Fish@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Kagi FastGPT is okay for fact checking. You've just gotta put "cite sources" at the end of your query and it will add in-text citations with hyperlinks. Then you can double check its answers.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Really?
Last I tried the Gemini assistant on my phone, it wouldn't even let me finish labeling my alarms before cutting me off

[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago

I feel.the opposite. O1 preview is really good and Gemini Premium (which I used 3 Months ago) feels like a GPT3 Turbo with Internet Access.. even offline Llama3 is better! (Subjective Obviously, what do I know)