Greentext

4591 readers

718 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

646

Anon meets a girl at a wedding (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 week ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

115 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah even first cousins are actually not that bad, biologically speaking, if it's only done for one (or probably even two?) generation.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 4 points 1 week ago

AFAIK the risk is about the same as having a kid after 40.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yup, and AFAIK, it's legal in some areas to have kids with your first cousin.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably legal in more places than it's illegal

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It is, in fact, legal more places than not. Cousin marriage was extremely common for thousands of years. It only really started to drop off when people started owning cars and could meet people from further away. Most places still haven't changed their laws because the cultural change was so recent, and because it's low risk enough that it's not a serious concern if it's just once in a while rather than, say, medieval European royalty shenanigans.