Technology

59963 readers

3330 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

352

Judge Rejects Sale of Infowars to The Onion (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 6 days ago by Aatube@kbin.melroy.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“It seemed doomed almost from the moment they decided to go to a sealed bid,” Judge Lopez said. “Nobody knows what anybody else is bidding,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A first price sealed bid auction is a perfectly common type of auction.
It's functionally equivalent to an auction where you know the value of a thing (like we do a business being liquidated because the owner is in extremely deep unrelated legal debt), and the auctioneer starts by asking for the face value and then progressively lowers the ask until the first person accepts the price.
Instead of trying to get the lowest price possible, people are incentivised to start with their best offer for what they actually think the thing is valued. Allowing follow-up bids encourages people to low-ball and work their way up, which can reduce the price the seller gets for the item.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sealed-bid-auction.asp

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Common in bankruptcy as well?

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No idea, and not entirely sure why it matters. If your goal is to sell an asset and maximize proceeds, it's a known and unsurprising strategy, particularly since it gives higher returns when there are few bidders.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org -2 points 6 days ago

I think it has quite a chance of mattering. There's two choices here: the judge is incomptetent/compromised, or there's a reason this makes sense within the bankruptcy context. I want to explore the latter first before I make any judgements.