Technology

59963 readers

3075 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

325

LG stops making Blu-ray players, marking the end of an era — limited units remain while inventory lasts (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 6 days ago by ptz@dubvee.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

95 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Digital streaming is displacing the last remnants of physical media.

In a disappointing turn of events, FlatpanelsHD reports that LG has ended production of its Blu-ray player series, which includes the UBK80 and UBK90 models. With limited stock available, prospective buyers should act quickly to secure the last remaining units before they are sold out.

After Samsung and Sony's departure from physical media, LG was one of the last major manufacturers of Blu-ray players

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

but those only last a few years.

Where do people get this information? Hard drives are very stable now (as are SSDs). All of mine are still going strong after 6+ years.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

That was true a while back, but yes drives have gotten way better.

That's just failure rate though, not data loss. You need your drives using a sane file system like zfs or using raid 1/10/6 where discs can do error checking as well to prevent silent data loss.

They also need to be powered on. Offline drives will lose data to bit rot over time.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What about btrfs?

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

ZFS is better.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

What about it is better?

[–] weker01@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

ZFS is unfortunately not in the upstream Linux Kernel :/

Btrfs is worse in many aspects but I like its flexibility of adding drives with different capacities over time.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

How did we get becachefs upstreamed but not ZFS?

Edit: Nevermind, it's licensing related

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 0 points 5 days ago

OpenZFS works just fine.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

The lifetimes have improved, but according to your link, the currently measured average age of a drive at failure is 2 years, 10 months. They expect that to increase as they roll over to newer, more reliable drives. These drives are under heavy use, unlike drives used for offline storage, but still it's not really the kind of lifespan you'd ideally want in an archival medium.