Technology

59963 readers

3330 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

227

FBI warns users to encrypt text messages for cybersecurity. Here's how to do it (www.usatoday.com)

submitted 5 days ago by weirdbeardgame@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

81 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] asudox@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It would be great if XMPP were to rise again.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It went out of popularity for a reason. I'd love a new protocol with XMPP's mistakes fixed.

BTW, OMEMO highlights one of those - it's not as good as Signal by which it is inspired. Basically no metadata protection, which means that it's as good as OTR with multiple devices.

Some kind of Signal with federation (and good clients, not like signal-desktop) would be interesting. Maybe even p2p with some kind of relays (like in NOSTR) for history, offline messages, some kind of Telegram channels and such.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

Look into Session. I didn't like it but it checks your boxes

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Lol no. I like being able to send messages to someone who isn't online at the same time

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting xmpp can't do that? XD

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes. Asynchronous communication is dependent on both users servers software and config. And that's exactly why XMPP is disused.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure there's an option you can disable in server software to disable message storage. Why stop at this?

XMPP can't federate because there's an option for disabling that too! 😧

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Its the other way around. Asynchronous communication was a feature added later in some software. By default it didn't have it

I'm saying it'd a deal breaker if all users dont have asynchronous communication.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

You're technically correct but that was two decades ago. Novadays virtually every featured server passes the Conversations compliance test which continuously checks if all modern features are enabled.