this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
530 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59963 readers
3503 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BMTea@lemmy.world 159 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Planned obsolescence isn't even in my top 10. The worst things about Big Tech are existential, like its use for mass espionage and murder by evil regimes.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 hours ago

planned obsolescence wastes precious resources and massively contributes to climate change and our enslavement through consumption. its absolutely in my top 10

[–] AppleTea@lemmy.zip 19 points 21 hours ago

The biggest existential threat is still ecological destruction. Old growth forest are raised to the ground, the ocean is warming and acidifying as it absorbs CO2, and it's all to make computers and toasters that don't even last a decade.

Exactly. Planned obsolesce is an annoyance to my pocketbook. Violations of my privacy can completely screw me over for life.

We should absolutely solve both, but if I had to pick one, I'd go for privacy every time.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Planned obsolescence is a symptom of something which is, or aught to be, in your top 10 issues with big tech.

[–] ghostface@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Unless your planning on running your own infra for everything... I would argue planned obsolescence is a much greater and immediate threat.

Research is never long term. Imagine if the last 20yrs had been invested in increased ram and battery storage. Instead we have had a 20 halt on innovation in the residential side. Why big Phone wanted to stick with 4gb phone. And then 8gb so much so the reason they stopped was because it was becoming more expensive to make 8gb chips.

Unless you only pay cash, dont use Amazon to ship, google to research, Microsoft to compute... You are being tracked, the only difference now is the focus of the companies were for greed.