this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
496 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

59963 readers
3431 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
496
Discord’s New Age Verification uses AI and Your Face! (www.youtube.com)
submitted 2 days ago by empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
175 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/33458015

If I am required to do this, I am purging my Discord account immediately. I am not giving them face scans.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean I'm usually not the skeptic when it comes to privacy rights, but it's hard for me to defend against an action like this. Because I don't see a purpose of needing that information outside of the intent to sell to third party

[–] clgoh@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Social media are more and more required by law to prevent kids from using their service. I don't see a way to achieve that with no risks to privacy.

[–] mememuseum@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then there shouldn't be such laws. It's not the government's job to parent.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

won't somebody please think of the children!

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Which is why the laws suck. Don't fix a stupid law with stupid policy, fix the stupid law.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

I couldn't imagine an AI model will be very accurate of being able to identify a 11 year old vs a 13 year old. I assume this is more to try and vett whether they can access NSFW channels or not, but honestly since humans can't properly vett that, I don't know how an AI is supposed to reliably do that.