this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
1016 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

60528 readers
5088 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Retreaux@lemmy.world 75 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It was that combined with the fact that they create shadow profiles for your unborn child when your wife is pregnant. (Found out through FB being allowed to track your browsing history even off the app). That was the final straw right after the Cambridge Analytica issue.

[–] kofe@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wait what the bloody fuck? I haven't heard anything about this. Sounds right up their alley, but what evidence is it based on?

[–] Retreaux@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you look up the practical application of Shadow profiles they have the ability to gather information about non-users, which also includes unborn children in the case of them discovering that the mother is pregnant through whatever web searches that they may be doing even outside of Facebook. The whole science of Shadow profiles used to strengthen the algorithm is incredibly frightening and part of the reason why I left Facebook.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

I can almost excuse shadow profiles for things like "two people both have X contact in their phone", but making them for unborn children? Lord have mercy. That's genuinely crazy. It makes me wonder if it's something like they just marked someone as pregnant based on searches (weird, but maybe acceptable, idk) and it got taken out of context? Hopefully? Either way it's icky.

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I hadn't heard of this either but here's an article about Facebook keeping shadow profiles on non-users that references an article from 2012 where Target's data collection determined a teen girl was pregnant before she told her dad