Technology

59534 readers

3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

200

GTA 5 Actor Ned Luke Calls Out 'Bulls**t' AI Chatbot That Uses His Voice (www.ign.com)

submitted 10 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

GTA 5 Actor Ned Luke Calls Out 'Bullst' AI Chatbot That Uses His Voice::Grand Theft Auto voice actor Ned Luke, who played Michael De Santa in GTA 5, has called out a "fking bulls**t" AI chatbot which uses his voice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Well, scams are unethical regardless of method used. It would equally unethical if done by a human. So that's not the difference.

And Impersonators are already profiting off of someone else, since they're specifically hired to mimic someone.

The other points you mention all boil down to being ethically wrong because it's easy, which doesn't really make any sense IMO. why is a thing ethically wrong just because it's easy, if it wasn't ethically wrong when it was hard?

Would you consider a person using a voice-changer to mimic ethically wrong?

[–] tonyn@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Social animals like us invent ethics. It all comes down to what most people find appalling vs what most people find acceptable. A lot of that comes down to empathy. How would you feel if it was done to you?

[+] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz -7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Impersonating my voice? Not really something I have an issue with as such. From the article they are using the voice of the actor to impersonate a fictional character. If someone used my voice to create a fictional character like done here, I probably wouldn't have an issue with that.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are you a voice actor whose income relies on selling their voice performances? You might care then when companies just use a bot to make your voice while you go broke on the street.

[–] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Whether it's a voice actor relying on voice acting to not go broke, or a factory worker relying on menial tasks on a production line to not go broke doesn't really matter IMO. But pretty much no one bats an eye at the latter.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No one is pitching a fit because the percieved lose of skill isn't there. How many people can perform menial labor compared to the number of people that can perform voice acting labor in a specific language or languages? People are more outraged because they percieve a skilled laborer being attacked. The truth is, both forms of labor equate in more than one way.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

People are outraged because people with social status (actors, artists) in the west are losing out to technological disruption rather than the usual lower class people and people from the global south.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yes, that is also true. But I was replying to a comment about menial warehouse laborers being replaced with robotics. So I was staying in that scope.