this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
491 points (97.1% liked)

Greentext

4925 readers
1143 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 175 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

That seems totally fine. If he is upfront with clients that images are AI generated/uptouched, not real photos, and that is what they are paying for, that's just called running a business that innovated a saturated market. He found a way to produce a product and do it cheaper than everyone else.

Does it kinda cheapen out the experience from not capturing "real" memories? Personally I'd say yup. But that is my personal preference and not that of the clients.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Given that he does photos for 10 brides a day and still has free time, he must've been upfront about it.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t understand how because to make people look hot using ai you still need to make real pictures.

So either they just expanded the business with a popular side project or he has customers send their own pictures (which are rarely in the format, proportions, light conditions you need)

Most likely it never happened.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago
  • "Send a photo like this and I'll AI it up"
  • Client sends a photo like the one anon asked
  • anon runs the photo on AI thingy, gets some results
  • anon shows the result to client

I suspect the pics only need to have the person a similar enough pose to what they want, the AI generates the clothes and environment

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

Personally I would be more disturbed if he offered and delivered real photos but never had showed up at the wedding (to my knowledge as the client).

[–] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago

Agreed.

Does it kinda cheapen out the experience from not capturing "real" memories? Personally I'd say yup.

And as long as other people feel the same way, regular photographers will still have clients.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But pretty much all wedding photos are edited, so none of them are real photos.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Plus they are so generic that 99% of people you show them to will have forgotten them a second after the photo leaves their field of vision.