this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1137 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

66465 readers
4596 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
1137
OpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair use (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 day ago by cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
462 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] azalty@jlai.lu 5 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

To be fair, they’re not wrong. We need to find a legal comprise that satisfies everyone

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It's called paying for the content

[–] EnthusiasticNature94@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

This.

I support AI, but I don't understand why AI bros are complicating things or making things all-or-nothing.

OpenAI had enough money to hire a hitman on one of their whistleblowers. They can afford to pay for content, lol.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago

But how will corporations like Disney survive without copywrites?! Won't someone think about the poor corporations?!

/s

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Why? Nothing they've shat out is good for anything anyway.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

If not, AI is dead in the US

Technically, everything you write is copyrighted

[–] desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 hours ago

You don't need to say anything else, I'm already happy with that outcome

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There are works that are free to use. They could also compensate copyright holders for their work. As they should since they are profiting from it.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm all for compensating, but obviously paying for the full work will never work

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Oh no, how horrible... AI is dead in the US? How shall we live? /sarcasm

[–] t0m4@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not an american but losing in that area internationally might be way worse than to fight over training data.

Maybe not paying the full amount of the copyright, but I agree they should compensate the IP holders.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 1 points 1 hour ago

I don't believe there's a future in AI at all.