this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
244 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

68432 readers
11162 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 32 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Today I learned DidplayPort 2.1 can carry 240W.

[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's a lot of power! Are there even any devices that use this?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

PCs can use >1KW.

I don't know why you'd power a PC over DisplayPort though. New 8k monitors do go up to 190W, so we could exceed 240W if we try hard enough.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

So if you have a beefy psu you should be able to power your monitor off tbe DP?

Or does carrying power limit data throughput?

[–] CandleTiger@programming.dev 1 points 47 minutes ago

The way it works for power over Ethernet — and I assume USB power delivery must work the same way — is that it does not reduce bandwidth because they run the power and the signal over the same wires at the same time.

There is a a power injector at one end and a filter at the other end that separate out the high-frequency signal and the DC (no-frequency) power into different wires.

This is essentially the same thing as they’re already doing for multi-frequency stacking on those same wires (and on fiber) to get the crazy bandwidth in the first place. DC power is just one more low (very very low) frequency running on the same stack.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It might? I think USB uses data lanes for power delivery above some point, and I wouldn't be surprised if DP does the same.

[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Hi! I actually work at a major electrical connector company, so maybe I can shed some light on this.

I have no idea.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I used to work with electrical engineers, and whenever I asked about details, they'd shrug and say, "black magic?" Checks out.

Based on this pin configuration, there's only two dedicated power pins, which isn't very good for large wattages. The rest are twinax signal pairs separated by ground to reduce crosstalk.

Usually when connectors are designed for power delivery, they'll use bigger contacts to reduce the contact resistance (signal contacts tend to be small so you can fit more of them in the same space). I'm guessing the original DP connector form factor wasn't made with such high power in mind, so it would make a lot of sense to use the spare signal pins for power delivery in this case. Running too much power through too few small pins can damage the contacts, by either by instant-welding the contact surfaces or by overheating the connector (see NVIDIA GPUs) ((also high voltages can cause arcing, which even in the best case will seriously degrade any connector)).

Take all of this with a huge grain of salt cause I just learned this stuff like a month ago, and my department has nothing to do with any of it. Just though someone might find it interesting.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 hours ago

They fixed it.