this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

69098 readers
3105 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
0
Why I recommend against Brave. (thelibre.news)
submitted 4 weeks ago by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
49 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

If you are keen on personal privacy, you might have come across Brave Browser. Brave is a Chromium-based browser that promises to deliver privacy with built-in ad-blocking and content-blocking protection. It also offers several quality-of-life features and services, like a VPN and Tor access. I mean, it's even listed on the reputable PrivacyTools website. Why am I telling you to steer clear of this browser, then?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ubergeek@lemmy.today 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, it uses the same engine, but it blocks their ads.

Which means nothing, when Google can, and is, pushing technology to freely unleash their ad network on all web pages, as a function of the engine itself.

No, it's not a competitor. Excepting in their ad markets, and frankly, it's not a competitor, it's a statistical blip.

[โ€“] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

as a function of the engine itself.

AFAIK, there's nothing in Blink (the rendering engine), V8 (the JavaScript run engine), or any other low level pieces of the browser that does this. What they're doing is hamstringing extensions and building in a layer of tracking into the browser on top of the engine. A fork can absolutely keep the engine bits and remove the tracking bits.

The problem with Chrome's hegemony over the rendering engine has nothing to do with their ad network, but with their ability to steer people to use their products instead of competitors' (e.g. "Google Docs is faster on Chrome, switch today!" just because they introduced a chrome-only spec extension).

Brave absolutely is a competitor. They block Google's ads, have their own search engine (and are building their own index), and provide a privacy friendly alternative to Chrome without any compatibility issues. That's why it's my backup to Firefox (and forks), sometimes things don't work properly on Gecko and I want a privacy-friendly alternative to chrome. That used to be Chromium w/ uBlock Origin, but with that extension taken from the chrome web store, I reach for Brave, which has it built in.

And yeah, it doesn't have a ton of users. That doesn't mean they're not a competitor though.